Edgar J. Schoen: Difference between revisions
m typo (task force) |
m adjusted REFjournal |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
}}</ref> Schoen had a humorous poem about circumcision published in 1986.<ref name="schoen1986">{{REFjournal | }}</ref> Schoen had a humorous poem about circumcision published in 1986.<ref name="schoen1986">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Schoen | |last=Schoen | ||
| | |init=EG | ||
|author-link=Edgar J. Schoen | |author-link=Edgar J. Schoen | ||
|title=Ode to the Circumcised Male | |title=Ode to the Circumcised Male | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|last=Slack | |last=Slack | ||
|first=Gordy | |first=Gordy | ||
|init=G | |||
|title=The Case For Circumcision | |title=The Case For Circumcision | ||
|journal=Express Online | |journal=Express Online | ||
| Line 71: | Line 72: | ||
The 1989 AAP circumcision statement was not well received. Professor Ronald Poland, M. D., another member of the AAP task force, rejected Schoen's advocacy of non-therapeutic circumcision and published his own paper in which he argued against circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal | The 1989 AAP circumcision statement was not well received. Professor Ronald Poland, M. D., another member of the AAP task force, rejected Schoen's advocacy of non-therapeutic circumcision and published his own paper in which he argued against circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Poland | |last=Poland | ||
|first=Ronald L | |first=Ronald L. | ||
|init=RL | |||
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
|title=The question of routine neonatal circumcision | |title=The question of routine neonatal circumcision | ||
|journal=N Engl J Med | |journal=N Engl J Med | ||
|date=1990 | |date=1990 | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
|last=Hill | |last=Hill | ||
|first=George | |first=George | ||
|init=G | |||
|author-link=George Hill | |author-link=George Hill | ||
|last2=Geisheker | |last2=Geisheker | ||
|first2=John V. | |first2=John V. | ||
|init2=JV | |||
|author2-link=John V. Geisheker | |author2-link=John V. Geisheker | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||