Long foreskin: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Definition: Revise sentence. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Conclusion: Add text. |
||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
'''Long foreskins''' should not be described as "redundant", "excess", or "extra". It is a multi-functional, protective, sensitive, erogenous part of the normal [[penis]].<ref name="cold-taylor1999">{{ColdCJ TaylorJR 1999}}</ref> | '''Long foreskins''' should not be described as "redundant", "excess", or "extra". It is a multi-functional, protective, sensitive, erogenous part of the normal [[penis]].<ref name="cold-taylor1999">{{ColdCJ TaylorJR 1999}}</ref> | ||
[[Foreskinned]] men should be wary and cautious regarding claims by urologic surgeons, who [[financial incentive| profit from circumcision]], that a long [[foreskin]] is somehow unhealthy and should have an [[amputation]]. | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Acroposthion]] | * [[Acroposthion]] | ||