Foreskin restoration: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m →Physical aspects: Delete erroneous link. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m →Physical aspects: add date |
||
| Line 482: | Line 482: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
The work of Masters & Johnson (1966) has been shown to have severe methodological flaws that render their conclusions innaccurate and essentially useless. The work of Bleustein and Payne (2007) is similarly flawed by methodological faults. | The work of Masters & Johnson (1966) has been shown to have severe methodological flaws that render their conclusions innaccurate and essentially useless. The work of Bleustein (2003) and Payne (2007) is similarly flawed by methodological faults. | ||
Others have reported that it is more sensation in intact males.<ref name="sorrels">{{REFjournal | Others have reported that it is more sensation in intact males.<ref name="sorrels">{{REFjournal | ||