Sexual injury of circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Foreskin sensitivity: Add text and citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m →Female preferences and response: Revise citations. |
||
| Line 671: | Line 671: | ||
Williamson et al. (1988) studied randomly selected young mothers in Iowa, where most men are circumcised, and found that 76% would prefer a circumcised penis for achieving sexual arousal through viewing it.<ref>[http://www.circs.org/library/williamson/index.html Williamson ML, Williamson PS. Women's Preferences for Penile Circumcision in Sexual Partners.] J Sex Educ Ther 1988; 14: 8</ref> | Williamson et al. (1988) studied randomly selected young mothers in Iowa, where most men are circumcised, and found that 76% would prefer a circumcised penis for achieving sexual arousal through viewing it.<ref>[http://www.circs.org/library/williamson/index.html Williamson ML, Williamson PS. Women's Preferences for Penile Circumcision in Sexual Partners.] J Sex Educ Ther 1988; 14: 8</ref> | ||
O'Hara & O'Hara (1999) argue that foreskin is a natural gliding stimulator of the [[Vagina| vagina walls]] during intercourse, increasing a woman's overall clitoral stimulation and helping her achieve orgasm more quickly and more often. Without the foreskin's [[gliding action]], they suggest, it can be more difficult for a woman to achieve orgasm during intercourse.<ref name= "OHara1999">{{REFjournal | O'Hara & O'Hara (1999) argue that [[foreskin]] is a natural gliding stimulator of the [[Vagina| vagina walls]] during intercourse, increasing a woman's overall clitoral stimulation and helping her achieve orgasm more quickly and more often. Without the foreskin's [[gliding action]], they suggest, it can be more difficult for a woman to achieve orgasm during intercourse.<ref name= "OHara1999">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=O'Hara | |last=O'Hara | ||
|init=K | |init=K | ||
| Line 690: | Line 690: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Boyle & Bensley ( | Boyle & Bensley (2003) reported that the lack of a [[foreskin]] in the male partner produces symptoms similar to those of female arousal disorder.<ref name="bensley2001">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Bensley | |last=Bensley | ||
|first=Gillian A. | |first=Gillian A. | ||
| Line 701: | Line 699: | ||
|author2-link=Gregory J. Boyle | |author2-link=Gregory J. Boyle | ||
|title=Effects of male circumcision on female arousal and orgasm | |title=Effects of male circumcision on female arousal and orgasm | ||
|journal=New Zealand | |journal=New Zealand Medical Journal | ||
|volume=116 | |volume=116 | ||
|issue=1181 | |issue=1181 | ||
|pages=595-596 | |pages=595-596 | ||
|url= | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/bensley1/ | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
|pubmedID=14581975 | |pubmedID=14581975 | ||
|pubmedCID= | |pubmedCID= | ||
|DOI= | |DOI= | ||
|date=2003-09 | |date=2003-09-12 | ||
|accessdate=2020-04-27 | |accessdate=2020-04-27 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> The authors hypothesized that the [[gliding action]] possibly involved intercourse with an [[intact]] partner might help prevent the loss of vaginal lubrication.<ref name="boyle2003" /> They stated that the respondents were self-selected, and that larger sample sizes are needed.<ref name="boyle2003" /> | ||
A study by psychologists Bensley & Boyle (2003) reported that vaginal dryness can be a problem when the male partner is circumcised.<ref name="bensley2001" /> | |||
==Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations== | ==Effect of circumcision on heterosexual relations== | ||