Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
}}</ref><ref name="bma2006">Committee on Medical Ethics. [https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/children-and-young-people/non-therapeutic-male-circumcision-of-children-ethics-toolkit The law and ethics of male circumcision: Guidance for doctors]. London: British Medical Association 2006.</ref>
}}</ref><ref name="bma2006">Committee on Medical Ethics. [https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/children-and-young-people/non-therapeutic-male-circumcision-of-children-ethics-toolkit The law and ethics of male circumcision: Guidance for doctors]. London: British Medical Association 2006.</ref>


Some medical associations formerly took the position that the parents should determine what is in the best interest of the infant or child.<ref name="AAP1999">{{REFjournal
Some [[Medical trade association| medical trade associations]] formerly took the position that the parents should determine what is in the best interest of the newborn, infant, or child.<ref name="AAP1999">{{REFjournal
  |last=Task force on circumcision
  |last=Task force on circumcision
  |title=Circumcision policy statement
  |title=Circumcision policy statement