Abraham L. Wolbarst: Difference between revisions

Line 65: Line 65:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


Wolbarst's article appeared on the eve of World War I. It apparently influenced American military commanders to order [[adult circumcision| circumcision]] of military personnel under their command to prevent venereal diseases and improve military readiness.<ref name="hill2002">{{REFweb
Wolbarst's article appeared on the eve of World War I. It apparently influenced American military commanders to order [[adult circumcision| circumcision]] of military personnel under their command to prevent venereal diseases and improve military readiness.<ref name="skeldon2008" /> No statistics exist to document how many men were [[circumcised]] because of Wolbarst's article.
|url=http://purewatergazette.net/circumcision.htm
|title=The Rise and Fall of Neonatal Circumcision: The Irrational Abuse Of Helpless Children
|trans-title=
|language=
|last=Hill
|first=George
|author-link=George Hill
|publisher=
|website=purewatergazette
|date=2002-11-04
|accessdate=2020-03-30
|format=
|quote=
}}</ref> No statistics exist to document how many men were ]]circumcised]] because of Wolbarst's article.


The adoption of circumcision as a prophylactic [[amputation]] by American military services falsely stigmatized the [[foreskin]] as being unhealthy. [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]] (1999) has exhaustively shown that circumcision does not protect against STDs.<ref name="vanhowe1999">{{REFjournal
The adoption of circumcision as a prophylactic [[amputation]] by American military services falsely stigmatized the [[foreskin]] as being unhealthy. [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]] (1999) has exhaustively shown that circumcision does not protect against STDs.<ref name="vanhowe1999">{{REFjournal