Foreskin restoration: Difference between revisions

m History: Improver references
Physical aspects: Delete spurious material
Line 423: Line 423:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Some men who have undertaken foreskin restoration report a visibly smoother glans, which some of these men attribute to decreased levels of [[keratinization]] following restoration.  A study that investigated the effect of glans coverage on levels of keratinization found no difference in keratin levels<ref>{{REFweb
Some men who have undertaken foreskin restoration report a visibly smoother glans, which some of these men attribute to decreased levels of [[keratinization]] following restoration.   
| quote=
| url=http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/320/7249/1592
| title=How does male circumcision protect against HIV infection?
| last=
| first=
| publisher=
| work=
| date=
| accessdate=
}}</ref> within the group studied.


Several studies have suggested that the glans is equally sensitive in circumcised and uncircumcised males,<ref name="masters">{{REFbook
Several studies have suggested that the glans is equally sensitive in circumcised and uncircumcised males,<ref name="masters">{{REFbook