Alleged reasons for circumcision: Difference between revisions
m wikify HIV |
m adjusted REF |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
In 1966, Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without foreskin. | In 1966, Masters and Johnson erroneous claim that there is no difference in sensitivity between penises with and without foreskin. | ||
: ({{NOTE}} Their work helps propagate the medical dogma that circumcision has no effect on sexuality go practically unquestioned for nearly the next four decades.)<ref name="MastersJohnson1966">{{REFbook | : ({{NOTE}} Their work helps propagate the medical dogma that circumcision has no effect on sexuality go practically unquestioned for nearly the next four decades.)<ref name="MastersJohnson1966">{{REFbook | ||
|last=Masters | |last=Masters & Johnson | ||
|year=1966 | |year=1966 | ||
|title=Human Sexual Response | |title=Human Sexual Response | ||