Andrew Gross: Difference between revisions

Line 39:

}}

This "mission" clearly shows that he absolutely believes in a [[Parental rights|parental right]] of choice for genital [[mutilation]] of minors without any medical indication. This way he totally ignores the parental duty to protect children from harm. Circumcision promoters like him often totally ignore the [[human rights]] of the child. He even ignores the physical fact that "circumcision" aka [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] is always genital [[mutilation]] by definition.<ref name="IW">{{REFweb

This "mission" clearly shows that he absolutely believes in a [[Parental rights|parental right]] of choice for genital [[mutilation]] of minors without any [[medical indication]]. This way he totally ignores the parental duty to protect children from harm. Circumcision promoters like him often totally ignore the [[human rights]] of the child. He even ignores the physical fact that "circumcision" aka [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] is always genital [[mutilation]] by definition.<ref name="IW">{{REFweb

|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki2

|title=IntactWiki creates a page dedicated to me

Line 48:

=== No choice for human rights violations ===

The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.

The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without [[medical indication]] for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.

[[Peter W. Adler|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent medical indication.

[[Peter W. Adler|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent [[medical indication]].

== Guessed reasons for his engagement ==

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 }}
-This "mission" clearly shows that he absolutely believes in a [[Parental rights|parental right]] of choice for genital [[mutilation]] of minors without any medical indication. This way he totally ignores the parental duty to protect children from harm. Circumcision promoters like him often totally ignore the [[human rights]] of the child. He even ignores the physical fact that "circumcision" aka [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] is always genital [[mutilation]] by definition.<ref name="IW">{{REFweb
+This "mission" clearly shows that he absolutely believes in a [[Parental rights|parental right]] of choice for genital [[mutilation]] of minors without any [[medical indication]]. This way he totally ignores the parental duty to protect children from harm. Circumcision promoters like him often totally ignore the [[human rights]] of the child. He even ignores the physical fact that "circumcision" aka [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] is always genital [[mutilation]] by definition.<ref name="IW">{{REFweb
   |url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki2
   |title=IntactWiki creates a page dedicated to me
@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 === No choice for human rights violations ===
-The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without medical indication for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.
+The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without [[medical indication]] for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.
-[[Peter W. Adler|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent medical indication.
+[[Peter W. Adler|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent [[medical indication]].
 == Guessed reasons for his engagement ==