Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision: Difference between revisions

Relocate text. Comment out large section.
Line 425: Line 425:
In August 2017, the American Medical Association ''Journal of Ethics'' featured two separate articles challenging the morality of performing non-therapeutic infant circumcision.
In August 2017, the American Medical Association ''Journal of Ethics'' featured two separate articles challenging the morality of performing non-therapeutic infant circumcision.


Svoboda argues against non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="svoboda2017">{{REFjournal
[[J. Steven Svoboda| Svoboda]] argues against non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="svoboda2017">{{REFjournal
  |date=2017-08-01
  |date=2017-08-01
  |title=Nontherapeutic Circumcision of Minors as an Ethically Problematic Form of Iatrogenic Injury
  |title=Nontherapeutic Circumcision of Minors as an Ethically Problematic Form of Iatrogenic Injury
Line 824: Line 824:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
-->
-->
==Other views==
==Other views==
Povenmire (1988) argued that parents should not have the power to consent to neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="povenmire"/>
Povenmire (1988) argued that parents should not have the power to consent to neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="povenmire"/>