Literature about foreskin restoration: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
Line 157: Line 157:


The publication of articles in medical journals about foreskin restoration has been slight. The ancient practice of [[epispasm]] was revived by laymen. It bears testimony to the harm, injury, and damage done by medical doctors who practice [[circumcision]], so little has been printed in medical journals about [[foreskin restoration]]. Consequently, the typical medical doctor is entirely ignorant concerning foreskin restoration.
The publication of articles in medical journals about foreskin restoration has been slight. The ancient practice of [[epispasm]] was revived by laymen. It bears testimony to the harm, injury, and damage done by medical doctors who practice [[circumcision]], so little has been printed in medical journals about [[foreskin restoration]]. Consequently, the typical medical doctor is entirely ignorant concerning foreskin restoration.
The following selection does not claim to be complete and is sorted by year of publication (new to old).


# {{REFjournal
# {{REFjournal