Andrew Gross: Difference between revisions

Line 48:

=== No choice for human rights violations ===

The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without [[medical indication]] for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed ~~as fundamentally critical~~, if not as a call for human rights violations.

The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without [[medical indication]] for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed with suspicion, if not as a call for human rights violations.

[[Peter W. Adler|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent [[medical indication]].

Gross strictly believes: "Circumcision is not a human rights violation because foreskin is not a human right."<ref>{{REFweb

|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki4

|title=German intactivist pretends to be an American law expert

|pubisher=Circumcision Choice

|date=2022-09-03

|accessdate=2022-09-04

}}</ref> His recent statement shows very nicely that Gross really doesn't understand the range of [[human rights]] and that he doesn't care about children's rights at all. Bodily integrity is a human right and there parental rights don't cover the right to cut off intact body parts from children without any urgent medical indication.

== Guessed reasons for his engagement ==

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 === No choice for human rights violations ===
-The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without [[medical indication]] for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed as fundamentally critical, if not as a call for human rights violations.
+The approach of Gross and Circumcision Choice that it is reliably a parental choice whether to have a healthy child's healthy [[foreskin]] amputated without [[medical indication]] for any reason, disregards the legal fact that there is no choice as to whether or not to commit [[human rights]] abuses. Medically not indicated amputation of any part of a child's body is illegal by definition and cannot be legalized by parental agreements. Therefore, all information on the Circumcision Choice website should be viewed with suspicion, if not as a call for human rights violations.
 [[Peter W. Adler|Adler]] (2022) layed out in his comprehensive legal treatise [[Circumcision Is A Fraud: And The Coming Legal Reckoning]]: There is no legal basis for parents to consent to the irreversible amputation of healthy parts of their children's bodies without a compelling and urgent [[medical indication]].
+Gross strictly believes: "Circumcision is not a human rights violation because foreskin is not a human right."<ref>{{REFweb
+ |url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/intactwiki4
+ |title=German intactivist pretends to be an American law expert
+ |pubisher=Circumcision Choice
+ |date=2022-09-03
+ |accessdate=2022-09-04
+}}</ref> His recent statement shows very nicely that Gross really doesn't understand the range of [[human rights]] and that he doesn't care about children's rights at all. Bodily integrity is a human right and there parental rights don't cover the right to cut off intact body parts from children without any urgent medical indication.
 == Guessed reasons for his engagement ==