PEPFAR is history: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Relocate internal links to standard SEEALSO section. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add category. |
||
| (32 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:PEPFAR.png|right|thumb|PEPFAR]] | [[Image:PEPFAR.png|right|thumb|PEPFAR]] | ||
The '''President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief''' ('''PEPFAR''') | The '''President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief''' ('''PEPFAR''') was a United States governmental initiative to address the global [[HIV]] epidemic and help save the lives of those suffering from the disease. Launched by U.S. President George W. Bush in 2003 on the advice of [[Anthony Fauci]], PEPFAR has provided more than $85 billion in cumulative funding for [[HIV]]/[[AIDS]] treatment, prevention, and research since its inception, making it the largest global health program focused on a single disease in history. <b>PEPFAR was a failure and has now been terminated by the United States Government that eliminated the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in 2025 in accordance with the recommendation of the [[Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)]].</b> | ||
PEPFAR | PEPFAR (2025) has scrapped its ineffective and harmful "voluntary male medical circumcision" (VMMC) program after 15 years and at least 27,000,000 harmful and useless [[foreskin]] amputations.<ref name="gwarisa2025">{{REFnews | ||
|last= | |title=New PEPFAR Waiver Scraps Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Program | ||
|first= | |url=https://healthtimes.co.zw/2025/02/07/new-pepfar-waiver-scraps-voluntary-medical-male-circumcision-program/ | ||
| | |last=Gwarisa | ||
| | |first=Michael | ||
| | |init= | ||
|accessdate= | |author-link= | ||
}}</ref> | |publisher=Healthtimes | ||
|website= | |||
|date=2025-02-07 | |||
|accessdate=2025-02-15 | |||
|format= | |||
|quote= | |||
}}</ref> Numerous studies have demonstrated that [[adult circumcision]] is not effective in preventing [[HIV]] [[infection]]. | |||
PEPFAR ignominiously ended the provision of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys under age 15 in November 2019 due to significant abuses | PEPFAR ignominiously ended the provision of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys under age 15 in November 2019 due to significant, [[Complication| complications]], injuries, and other abuses. | ||
==Reimagining PEPFAR's Strategic Direction== | |||
This document, ''Reimagining PEPFAR's Strategic Direction'', published in September 2022, provides new directions for PEPFAR's fight against the ''HIV'' pandemic. The document is entirely silent on male and female circumcision, although male circumcision was the cornerstone of the previous effort to prevent HIV infection and PEPFAR formerly proudly trumpeted the 32,000,000+ circumcisions (AKA genital mutilations) in Africa that it had sponsored. It is unclear if PEPFAR will continue to promote circumcision, which has been demonstrated to be ineffective.<ref name="reimagining2022">{{REFdocument | |||
|title=Reimagining PEPFAR's Strategic Directio | |||
|url=https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/PEPFAR-Strategic-Direction_FINAL.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher=U.S. Department of State | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|date=2022-09 | |||
|accessdate=2022-11-28 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<!-- | |||
== World AIDS Day (2010) Announcements == | == World AIDS Day (2010) Announcements == | ||
| Line 33: | Line 52: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==FACT SHEET: The Beginning of the End of AIDS 2011 == | == FACT SHEET: The Beginning of the End of AIDS 2011 == | ||
{{Citation | {{Citation | ||
|Text=PEPFAR is leading the world in support for a rapid expansion of voluntary medical male circumcision. In the past few years, research has proven that this low-cost procedure reduces the risk of female-to-male transmission by more than 60 percent—and the benefit is life-long. Approximately one million male circumcisions for HIV prevention have been done in recent years, with the United States providing the support for three-quarters of them. Building on this, over the next two years, PEPFAR will support more than 4.7 million voluntary medical male circumcisions in Eastern and Southern Africa. | |Text=PEPFAR is leading the world in support for a rapid expansion of voluntary medical male circumcision. In the past few years, research has proven that this low-cost procedure reduces the risk of female-to-male transmission by more than 60 percent—and the benefit is life-long. Approximately one million male circumcisions for [[HIV]] prevention have been done in recent years, with the United States providing the support for three-quarters of them. Building on this, over the next two years, PEPFAR will support more than 4.7 million voluntary medical male circumcisions in Eastern and Southern Africa. | ||
|Author= | |Author= | ||
|Source=The White House | |Source=The White House | ||
| Line 42: | Line 61: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Note that the 60% is a relative risk reduction (absolute risk reduction 1.31%) during 18 months - not life-long.<ref name="boyle2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref> | Note that the 60% is a relative risk reduction (absolute risk reduction 1.31%) during 18 months - not life-long.<ref name="boyle2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref>--> | ||
== Swaziland == | == Swaziland == | ||
| Line 61: | Line 80: | ||
|date=2011-03-04 | |date=2011-03-04 | ||
|publisher=Science Speaks: HIV & TB News | |publisher=Science Speaks: HIV & TB News | ||
|quote=The Ministry of Health, supported principally by UNICEF and PEPFAR, is currently working to introduce and scale up neonatal circumcision. | |quote=The Ministry of Health, supported principally by [[UNICEF]] and [[PEPFAR]], is currently working to introduce and scale up neonatal circumcision. | ||
|accessdate=2011-05-06 | |accessdate=2011-05-06 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Point of Interest: In recent studies, HIV transmission was found to be more prevalent in circumcised males in Swaziland. The drive to circumcise the majority of Swazi men continues none the less.<ref>{{REFjournal | Point of Interest: In recent studies, [[HIV]] transmission was found to be more prevalent in [[circumcised]] males in Swaziland. The drive to circumcise the majority of Swazi men continues none the less.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last= | |last= | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 75: | Line 94: | ||
|pages= | |pages= | ||
|url=http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FR202/FR202.pdf | |url=http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FR202/FR202.pdf | ||
|quote=As Table 14.10 shows, the relationship between HIV prevalence and circumcision status is not in the expected direction. Circumcised men have a slightly higher HIV infection rate than men who are not circumcised (22 percent compared with 20 percent | |quote=As Table 14.10 shows, the relationship between [[HIV]] prevalence and circumcision status is not in the expected direction. Circumcised men have a slightly higher [[HIV]] infection rate than men who are not circumcised (22 percent compared with 20 percent | ||
|accessdate=2011-05-06 | |accessdate=2011-05-06 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| Line 94: | Line 113: | ||
}} | }} | ||
From the PEPFAR Blueprint: Creating an AIDS-free Generation (emphasis added):<REF>{{REFweb | From the PEPFAR Blueprint: Creating an [[AIDS]]-free Generation (emphasis added):<REF>{{REFweb | ||
|last= | |last= | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 104: | Line 123: | ||
{{Citation | {{Citation | ||
|Text=Action Step: Increase the number of males who are circumcised for the prevention of HIV.... | |Text=Action Step: Increase the number of males who are circumcised for the prevention of [[HIV]].... | ||
10. Build the capacity of partner governments to begin planning for and financing an integrated, long-term '''early infant male circumcision (EIMC)''' program as the adult V[oluntary ]M[edical ]M[ale ]C[ircumcision] program is being scaled-up. PEPFAR’s financial support is prioritized to the adult VMMC program. However, '''once the adult program has progressed sufficiently, PEPFAR funds may be used to support EIMC activities'''. | 10. Build the capacity of partner governments to begin planning for and financing an integrated, long-term '''early infant male circumcision (EIMC)''' program as the adult V[oluntary ]M[edical ]M[ale ]C[ircumcision] program is being scaled-up. PEPFAR’s financial support is prioritized to the adult VMMC program. However, '''once the adult program has progressed sufficiently, PEPFAR funds may be used to support EIMC activities'''. | ||
| Line 130: | Line 149: | ||
== PEPFAR's African Safaris == | == PEPFAR's African Safaris == | ||
From a blog.AIDS.gov entry by Jeffrey S. Crowley, {{MPH}}, Director, Office of National AIDS Policy dated 26 May 2011:<ref>{{REFweb | From a blog.AIDS.gov entry by Jeffrey S. Crowley, {{MPH}}, Director, Office of National [[AIDS]] Policy dated 26 May 2011:<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|last= | |last= | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
| Line 140: | Line 159: | ||
{{Citation | {{Citation | ||
|Text=Last week, I wrote about my attendance at the PEPFAR annual meeting in South Africa, the country that has more people living with HIV (over 5 million) than any other country in the world. After this meeting, I visited the neighboring country of Swaziland, which has the unwelcome distinction of having the highest HIV and TB prevalence rates in the world. | |Text=Last week, I wrote about my attendance at the PEPFAR annual meeting in South Africa, the country that has more people living with [[HIV]] (over 5 million) than any other country in the world. After this meeting, I visited the neighboring country of Swaziland, which has the unwelcome distinction of having the highest [[HIV]] and TB prevalence rates in the world. | ||
... | ... | ||
The United States Ambassador to Swaziland, the Honorable Earl Irving, was an incredible host. I attended a large reception at the Ambassador’s residence with the Honorable Minister of Health, Benedict Xaba and other Swazi leaders working on HIV, as well as representatives from PEPFAR, Peace Corps, CDC, USAID, DoD, and private American institutions, including Columbia University’s International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs (ICAP) project. | The United States Ambassador to Swaziland, the Honorable Earl Irving, was an incredible host. I attended a large reception at the Ambassador’s residence with the Honorable Minister of Health, Benedict Xaba and other Swazi leaders working on [[HIV]], as well as representatives from PEPFAR, Peace Corps, CDC, USAID, DoD, and private American institutions, including Columbia University’s International Center for [[AIDS]] Care and Treatment Programs (ICAP) project. Another evening, the Ambassador hosted a dinner with leaders from the Swazi Cabinet, the Ministry of Health and the national [[AIDS]] commission. I participated in a handover ceremony where the Ambassador ceremoniously transferred nine vehicles from PEPFAR to the government of Swaziland that will support their [[HIV]] work in the field. Through this event I also had the opportunity to meet His Excellency the Right Honorable Prime Minister of Swaziland. | ||
A major focus of PEPFAR’s work is to assist the Swazi government’s plan to scale up adult male circumcision. This lowers the risk that men will acquire HIV infection and research models indicate that if the country can get up to 80% of its adult men circumcised, they could observe a substantial decline in HIV transmission. I visited one of several mobile sites that enabled Swaziland and PEPFAR to quickly expand access to circumcision. | A major focus of PEPFAR’s work is to assist the Swazi government’s plan to scale up adult male circumcision. This lowers the risk that men will acquire [[HIV]] infection and research models indicate that if the country can get up to 80% of its adult men circumcised, they could observe a substantial decline in [[HIV]] transmission. I visited one of several mobile sites that enabled Swaziland and PEPFAR to quickly expand access to circumcision. | ||
|Author= | |Author= | ||
|Source= | |Source= | ||
| Line 153: | Line 172: | ||
==RCTs shown to be erroneous== | ==RCTs shown to be erroneous== | ||
Boyle & Hill (2011) established conclusively that the randomized controlled trials had disabling methodological and statistical flaws that invalidated their findings,<ref name="boyle2011" /> therefore the PEPFAR VMMC program is based on false information. Van Howe & (2011) correctly forecast that institution of a circumcision program would increase the number of HIV infections.<ref>{{REFjournal | Boyle & Hill (2011) established conclusively that the randomized controlled trials had disabling methodological and statistical flaws that invalidated their findings,<ref name="boyle2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref> therefore the PEPFAR VMMC program is based on false information. [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]] & Storms (2011) correctly forecast that institution of a circumcision program would increase the number of [[HIV]] infections.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Van Howe | |last=Van Howe | ||
|first=Robert S. | |first=Robert S. | ||
|init= | |init=RS | ||
|author-link=Robert S. Van Howe | |author-link=Robert S. Van Howe | ||
|last2=Storms | |last2=Storms | ||
|first2=Michelle | |first2=Michelle | ||
|init2= | |init2=M | ||
|author2-link= | |author2-link= | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
|title=How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections | |title=How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections | ||
|journal=Journal of Public Health in Africa | |journal=Journal of Public Health in Africa | ||
|location= | |location= | ||
| Line 181: | Line 198: | ||
|DOI=10.4081/jphia.2011.e4 | |DOI=10.4081/jphia.2011.e4 | ||
|accessdate=2021-02-16 | |accessdate=2021-02-16 | ||
}}</ref> PEPFAR, however, paid no attention to these warnings and continued to promote the harmful VMMC program. | }}</ref> [[Robert S. Van Howe|Van Howe]] & Boyle (2018) added further critical comment and suggested the possibility of fraud.<ref name="vanhowe2018">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Van Howe | |||
|first= | |||
|init=RS | |||
|author-link=Robert S. Van Howe | |||
|last2=Boyle | |||
|first2= | |||
|init2=GJ | |||
|author2-link=Gregory J. Boyle | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Meta-analysis of HIV-acquisition studies incomplete and unstable | |||
|journal=BJU Int | |||
|date=2018-10-31 | |||
|url=https://www.bjuinternational.com/letters/meta-analysis-circumcision-incomplete-unstable/ | |||
|quote=Given the effectiveness of condoms, the lack of consistent findings on national levels, the methodologically flawed RCTs, the lack of translational research, and the impressive potential uptake and effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis, circumcision as an intervention to prevent HIV infection should be treated with greater scepticism. | |||
|pubmedID= | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI= | |||
|accessdate=2022-01-01 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
PEPFAR, however, paid no attention to these warnings and continued to promote the harmful VMMC program. | |||
== Investigations by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) == | == Investigations by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) == | ||
| Line 195: | Line 233: | ||
{{Citation | {{Citation | ||
|Text=Our review found that CDC did not always monitor recipients’ use of President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) funds in accordance with departmental and other Federal requirements. CDC implements PEPFAR, working with ministries of health and other public health partners to combat HIV/AIDS by strengthening health systems and building sustainable HIV/AIDS programs in more than 75 countries in Africa, Asia, Central and South America, and the Caribbean. HHS receives PEPFAR funds from the Department of State through a memorandum of agreement. | |Text=Our review found that CDC did not always monitor recipients’ use of President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) funds in accordance with departmental and other Federal requirements. CDC implements PEPFAR, working with ministries of health and other public health partners to combat [[HIV]]/AIDS by strengthening health systems and building sustainable [[HIV]]/AIDS programs in more than 75 countries in Africa, Asia, Central and South America, and the Caribbean. HHS receives PEPFAR funds from the Department of State through a memorandum of agreement. | ||
There was evidence that CDC performed some monitoring of recipients’ use of PEPFAR funds. However, most of the award files did not include all required documents or evidence to demonstrate that CDC performed required monitoring on all cooperative agreements. Of the 30 cooperative agreements in our sample, the award file for only 1 agreement contained all required documents. The remaining 29 award files were incomplete. In addition, 14 of 21 files were missing audit reports. (A report was not yet due for 9 of the 30 cooperative agreements.) The lack of required documentation demonstrates that CDC has not exercised proper stewardship over Federal PEPFAR funds because it did not consistently follow departmental and other Federal requirements in monitoring PEPFAR recipients. | There was evidence that CDC performed some monitoring of recipients’ use of PEPFAR funds. However, most of the award files did not include all required documents or evidence to demonstrate that CDC performed required monitoring on all cooperative agreements. Of the 30 cooperative agreements in our sample, the award file for only 1 agreement contained all required documents. The remaining 29 award files were incomplete. In addition, 14 of 21 files were missing audit reports. (A report was not yet due for 9 of the 30 cooperative agreements.) The lack of required documentation demonstrates that CDC has not exercised proper stewardship over Federal PEPFAR funds because it did not consistently follow departmental and other Federal requirements in monitoring PEPFAR recipients. | ||
| Line 230: | Line 268: | ||
{{Citation | {{Citation | ||
|Title= | |Title= | ||
|Text=Through its Global HIV/AIDS Program, CDC implemented the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), working with ministries of health and other in-country partners to combat HIV/AIDS by strengthening health systems and building sustainable HIV/AIDS programs in more than 75 countries. Through a 5-year cooperative agreement, CDC awarded PEPFAR funds totaling $20.6 million to the Republic of Namibia, Ministry of Health and Social Services (the Ministry) for the budget period September 30, 2009, through September 29, 2010. | |Text=Through its Global [[HIV]]/[[AIDS]] Program, CDC implemented the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), working with ministries of health and other in-country partners to combat [[HIV]]/[[AIDS]] by strengthening health systems and building sustainable [[HIV]]/[[AIDS]] programs in more than 75 countries. Through a 5-year cooperative agreement, CDC awarded PEPFAR funds totaling $20.6 million to the Republic of Namibia, Ministry of Health and Social Services (the Ministry) for the budget period September 30, 2009, through September 29, 2010. | ||
Our audit found that the Ministry did not always manage PEPFAR funds or meet program goals in accordance with award requirements. With respect to financial management, specifically financial transaction testing, we found that $3.7 million of the $4 million reviewed was allowable, but $243,000 was not. Additionally, the Ministry used PEPFAR funds to pay $565,000 of potentially unallowable value-added taxes (VAT) on purchases, did not accurately report PEPFAR expenditures for this cooperative agreement on its financial status report (FSR) submitted to CDC, and did not obtain an annual financial audit as required by Federal regulations. | Our audit found that the Ministry did not always manage PEPFAR funds or meet program goals in accordance with award requirements. With respect to financial management, specifically financial transaction testing, we found that $3.7 million of the $4 million reviewed was allowable, but $243,000 was not. Additionally, the Ministry used PEPFAR funds to pay $565,000 of potentially unallowable value-added taxes (VAT) on purchases, did not accurately report PEPFAR expenditures for this cooperative agreement on its financial status report (FSR) submitted to CDC, and did not obtain an annual financial audit as required by Federal regulations. | ||
| Line 278: | Line 316: | ||
{{Citation | {{Citation | ||
|Title=President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds | |Title=President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Funds | ||
|Text=The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program authorized $78 billion from 2003 through 2014 in support of international programs for prevention, treatment, and care to combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria. OIG examined the funds spent through this program in a 2011 report focusing on whether the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) oversight met departmental and Federal regulations. OIG found that while CDC performed some oversight of recipients' fund use, most of the award files did not include all required documents or evidence to demonstrate that CDC performed required monitoring. Because of these concerns, OIG expanded its audits internationally to include CDC's monitoring of PEPFAR funds by offices in other countries as well as audits of recipient organizations abroad. OIG issued two audits on Namibia, one in 2012 and another in 2013, and has an additional eight audits conducted there and in South Africa and Vietnam that are near completion." OIG is also planning seven more audits of PEPFAR grantees in Ethiopia and Zambia for FY 2013. | |Text=The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program authorized $78 billion from 2003 through 2014 in support of international programs for prevention, treatment, and care to combat [[HIV]]/[[AIDS]], tuberculosis, and malaria. OIG examined the funds spent through this program in a 2011 report focusing on whether the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) oversight met departmental and Federal regulations. OIG found that while CDC performed some oversight of recipients' fund use, most of the award files did not include all required documents or evidence to demonstrate that CDC performed required monitoring. Because of these concerns, OIG expanded its audits internationally to include CDC's monitoring of PEPFAR funds by offices in other countries as well as audits of recipient organizations abroad. OIG issued two audits on Namibia, one in 2012 and another in 2013, and has an additional eight audits conducted there and in South Africa and Vietnam that are near completion." OIG is also planning seven more audits of PEPFAR grantees in Ethiopia and Zambia for FY 2013. | ||
|Author= | |Author= | ||
|Source= | |Source= | ||
| Line 285: | Line 323: | ||
==Recent developments== | ==Recent developments== | ||
Garenne & Matthews (2019) reported that there is little difference in the incidence of HIV infection between circumcised men and intact men in Zambia. The authors stated that the "effectiveness of VMMC could therefore be seriously questioned."<ref name="garrenne2019">{{REFjournal | [[Michel Garenne|Garenne]] & Matthews (2019) reported that there is little difference in the incidence of [[HIV]] infection between [[circumcised]] men and [[intact]] men in Zambia. The authors stated that the "effectiveness of VMMC could therefore be seriously questioned."<ref name="garrenne2019">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Garenne | |last=Garenne | ||
|first=Michel | |first=Michel | ||
|init= | |init=M | ||
|author-link= | |author-link=Michel Garenne | ||
|last2=Matthews | |last2=Matthews | ||
|first2=Alan | |first2=Alan | ||
|init2= | |init2=A | ||
|author2-link= | |author2-link= | ||
|etal=no | |etal=no | ||
| Line 343: | Line 381: | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[George C. Denniston]], {{MD}}, {{MPH}}, the president of [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.) | [[George C. Denniston]], {{MD}}, {{MPH}}, the president of [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]], in a letter to Ambassador Deborah L. Birx, {{MD}}, {{MPH}}, dated 29 June 2020, the head of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), has called on PEPFAR to suspend the provision of male [[circumcision]] because it is ineffective and may increase the reception of [[HIV]] infection due to the loss of [[Immunological and protective function of the foreskin| immunological protections]] of the [[foreskin]], and to focus on the provision of anti-retroviral therapy and condoms.<ref name="denniston2020">{{REFdocument | ||
|title=Letter to Deborah L. Birx, M.D. | |title=Letter to Deborah L. Birx, M.D. | ||
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2020-06-15b_LettertoPEPFAR.pdf | |url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/images/2020-06-15b_LettertoPEPFAR.pdf | ||
| Line 349: | Line 387: | ||
|last=Denniston | |last=Denniston | ||
|first=George C. | |first=George C. | ||
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | |publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] | ||
|format= | |format= | ||
|date=2020-06-29 | |date=2020-06-29 | ||
| Line 357: | Line 395: | ||
The [https://www.vmmcproject.org/ VMMC Experience Project] published an 18-page article on 9 September 2020, that is highly critical of PEPFAR's male circumcision program. In brief, it charges: | The [https://www.vmmcproject.org/ VMMC Experience Project] published an 18-page article on 9 September 2020, that is highly critical of PEPFAR's male circumcision program. In brief, it charges: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Campaigns to circumcise millions of boys and men to reduce HIV transmission are | Campaigns to circumcise millions of boys and men to reduce [[HIV]] transmission are | ||
being conducted throughout eastern and southern Africa, recommended by the | being conducted throughout eastern and southern Africa, recommended by the | ||
World Health Organization and implemented by the United States government and | World Health Organization and implemented by the United States government and | ||
| Line 365: | Line 403: | ||
contextual research, and the manner in which they have been carried out implies | contextual research, and the manner in which they have been carried out implies | ||
troubling assumptions about culture, health, and sexuality in Africa, as well as a failure | troubling assumptions about culture, health, and sexuality in Africa, as well as a failure | ||
to properly consider the economic determinants of HIV prevalence. This critical | to properly consider the economic determinants of [[HIV]] prevalence. This critical | ||
appraisal examines the history and politics of these circumcision campaigns while | appraisal examines the history and politics of these circumcision campaigns while | ||
highlighting the relevance of race and colonialism. It argues that the “circumcision | highlighting the relevance of race and colonialism. It argues that the “circumcision | ||
solution” to African HIV epidemics has more to do with cultural imperialism than with | solution” to African [[HIV]] epidemics has more to do with cultural imperialism than with | ||
sound health policy, and concludes that African communities need a means of robust | sound health policy, and concludes that African communities need a means of robust | ||
representation within the regime.<ref name="fish2020">{{REFjournal | representation within the regime.<ref name="fish2020">{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 417: | Line 455: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
[[David Gisselquist]] (2021) reported that "circumcising men to reduce their risk to get HIV from sex" was an error. | [[David Gisselquist]] (2021) reported that "circumcising men to reduce their risk to get [[HIV]] from sex" was an error. | ||
<blockquote>In 2007, WHO and UNAIDS recommended “male circumcision should be recognized as an additional, important strategy for the prevention of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men.” Subsequently, WHO and UNAIDS endorsed programs to circumcise 20 million men in 14 countries in sub-Saharan Africa during 2008-15.[34] After 11.7 million circumcisions were reported through 2015, UNAIDS set a new target to circumcise another 25 million men in 15 countries during 2016-20. Through 2017, the US government supported more than 80% of these circumcisions. | <blockquote>In 2007, WHO and UNAIDS recommended “male circumcision should be recognized as an additional, important strategy for the prevention of heterosexually acquired [[HIV]] infection in men.” Subsequently, WHO and UNAIDS endorsed programs to circumcise 20 million men in 14 countries in sub-Saharan Africa during 2008-15.[34] After 11.7 million circumcisions were reported through 2015, UNAIDS set a new target to circumcise another 25 million men in 15 countries during 2016-20. Through 2017, the US government supported more than 80% of these circumcisions. | ||
WHO’s and UNAIDS’ recommendation was based on three studies in Africa that reported circumcised men were less likely to get HIV than intact men. But what happened in those studies? In two of the studies, men who reported no sexual risks (no partners or 100% condom use) got HIV at rates more than half as fast as the rates for men who reported any unprotected sex. The third study did not report men’s sexual risks. One study tested most wives, but has not said if the wives of men getting new infections during the study were known to be HIV-positive or HIV-negative. | WHO’s and UNAIDS’ recommendation was based on three studies in Africa that reported circumcised men were less likely to get [[HIV]] than intact men. But what happened in those studies? In two of the studies, men who reported no sexual risks (no partners or 100% condom use) got [[HIV]] at rates more than half as fast as the rates for men who reported any unprotected sex. The third study did not report men’s sexual risks. One study tested most wives, but has not said if the wives of men getting new infections during the study were known to be [[HIV]]-positive or [[HIV]]-negative. | ||
But criticizing these studies – how they were badly managed and reported<ref name="boyle2011" /> – does not get to the heart of the problem with circumcising millions of men to prevent HIV. Insofar as sex is a risk, men already have multiple options to protect themselves. And because there is overwhelming evidence bloodborne risks – most likely in medical settings – drive Africa’s epidemics (Chapter 6), it is irresponsible to put millions of men at risk for HIV and other bad outcomes from unnecessary operations.<ref>{{REFbook | But criticizing these studies – how they were badly managed and reported<ref name="boyle2011" /> – does not get to the heart of the problem with circumcising millions of men to prevent [[HIV]]. Insofar as sex is a risk, men already have multiple options to protect themselves. And because there is overwhelming evidence bloodborne risks – most likely in medical settings – drive Africa’s epidemics (Chapter 6), it is irresponsible to put millions of men at risk for [[HIV]] and other bad outcomes from unnecessary operations.<ref>{{REFbook | ||
|last=Gisselquist | |last=Gisselquist | ||
|first=David | |first=David | ||
|init=D | |||
|year=2021 | |year=2021 | ||
|title= Stopping Bloodborne HIV: investigating unexplained infections | |title= Stopping Bloodborne HIV: investigating unexplained infections | ||
| Line 433: | Line 472: | ||
}}</ref></blockquote> | }}</ref></blockquote> | ||
[[George Hill]], CFI, ATR, acting for Doctors Opposing Circumcision, wrote to Deborah L. Birx on 28 January 2021 regarding her lack of action and to transmit a copy of the article by Fish et al. (2020).<ref name="hill2021">{{REFdocument | [[George Hill]], CFI, ATR, acting for [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]], wrote to Deborah L. Birx on 28 January 2021 regarding her lack of action and to transmit a copy of the article by Fish et al. (2020).<ref name="hill2021">{{REFdocument | ||
|title=Letter to Deborah L. Birx | |title=Letter to Deborah L. Birx | ||
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/w/images/2021-01-28A_LetterBirx_516.pdf | |url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/w/images/2021-01-28A_LetterBirx_516.pdf | ||
| Line 439: | Line 478: | ||
|last=Hill | |last=Hill | ||
|first=George | |first=George | ||
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | |publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] | ||
|format=PDF | |format=PDF | ||
|date=2021-01-28 | |date=2021-01-28 | ||
| Line 445: | Line 484: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
The United States Department of State on 10 February 2021, announced a "temporary pause" in the development of Country Operational Plans and Regional Operational Plans, which it said was caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Department of State affirmed that "HIV prevention and treatment services" would continue, but made no mention of male circumcision or VMMC.<ref name="state2021">{{REFweb | The United States Department of State on 10 February 2021, announced a "temporary pause" in the development of Country Operational Plans and Regional Operational Plans, which it said was caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Department of State affirmed that "[[HIV]] prevention and treatment services" would continue, but made no mention of male circumcision or VMMC.<ref name="state2021">{{REFweb | ||
|url=https://www.state.gov/temporary-pause-on-pepfar-cop-rop-2021-development-due-to-covid-19/ | |url=https://www.state.gov/temporary-pause-on-pepfar-cop-rop-2021-development-due-to-covid-19/ | ||
|title=Temporary Pause on PEPFAR COP/ROP 2021 Development Due to COVID-19 | |title=Temporary Pause on PEPFAR COP/ROP 2021 Development Due to COVID-19 | ||
| Line 454: | Line 493: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
== Population-based studies == | |||
{{Population-based studies}} | |||
==Two African surveys== | |||
The previously reported studies were from developed Western nations. Now we have information from Sub_Saharan Africa. | |||
French scientist [[Michel Garenne]], Ph.D. has published two reports in 2022 comparing the incidence of HIV infection in [[circumcised]] and [[intact]] men. | |||
In his first report, Garenne presented the findings from a study in Lesotho, the enclave in South Africa. He reported: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
In couple studies, the effect of circumcision and VMMC on HIV was not significant, with similar transmission from female to male and male to female. The study questions the amount of effort and money spent on VMMC in Lesotho.<ref name="garenne2022A">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Garenne | |||
|first=Michel | |||
|init=M | |||
|author-link=Michel Garenne | |||
|title=Changing relationships between HIV prevalence and circumcision in Lesotho | |||
|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35373731/ | |||
|date=2022-04-04 | |||
|journal=J Biosoc Sci | |||
|volume=online ahead of print | |||
|pages=1-16 | |||
|DOI=10.1017/S0021932022000153 | |||
|pubmedID=35373731 | |||
|accessdate=2022-11-04 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
In his second report, Garenne (2022) presented information from six Sub-Saharan African nations (Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe). He reported: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
"Results matched earlier observations made in South Africa that [[circumcised]] and [[intact]] men had similar levels of HIV infection."<ref name="garenne2022B">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Garenne | |||
|first=Michael | |||
|init=M | |||
|author-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Age-incidence and prevalence of HIV among intact and circumcised men: an analysis of PHIA surveys in Southern Africa | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=J Biosoc Sci | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2022-10-26 | |||
|season= | |||
|volume= | |||
|issue= | |||
|article= | |||
|page= | |||
|pages=1-13 | |||
|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/abs/ageincidence-and-prevalence-of-hiv-among-intact-and-circumcised-men-an-analysis-of-phia-surveys-in-southern-africa/CAA7E7BD5A9844F41C6B7CC3573B9E50 | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=36286328 | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI=10.1017/S0021932022000414 | |||
|accessdate=2022-11-04 | |||
}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Centers for Disease Control|CDC]] | * [[Centers for Disease Control|CDC]] | ||
* [[Circumcision and HIV]] | * [[Circumcision and HIV]] | ||
* [[National Institutes of Health|NIH]] | * [[National Institutes of Health|NIH]] | ||
* [[Stop the Cut]] | |||
* [[World Health Organization]] | * [[World Health Organization]] | ||
* [[USAID]] | * [[USAID]] | ||
| Line 472: | Line 566: | ||
* {{REFweb | * {{REFweb | ||
|url=https://foregen.webflow.io/commentarium-articles/international-contractors-are-profiteering-from-new-circumcision-devices | |url=https://foregen.webflow.io/commentarium-articles/international-contractors-are-profiteering-from-new-circumcision-devices | ||
|title=International Contractors are Profiteering from New Circumcision Devices | |title=International Contractors are Profiteering from New Circumcision Devices | ||
|last=[[Foregen]] Staff | |||
|last=Foregen Staff | |||
|first= | |first= | ||
|author-link= | |author-link= | ||
|publisher=Foregen | |publisher=[[Foregen]] | ||
|date=2021-03-08 | |date=2021-03-08 | ||
|accessdate=2021-03-08 | |accessdate=2021-03-08 | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{URLwebsite|https://www.state.gov/pepfar/|2021-12-31}} | |||
{{ABBR}} | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Circumcision in Africa]] | [[Category:Circumcision in Africa]] | ||
[[Category:Fund]] | |||
[[Category:Program]] | |||
[[Category:Scandal]] | |||
[[Category:From CircLeaks]] | [[Category:From CircLeaks]] | ||