Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
m using template BoyleGJ SvobodaJS PriceCP TurnerJN 2000 |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|isbn=978-1-4496-7600-1 | |isbn=978-1-4496-7600-1 | ||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W6eRUtlujbkC&pg=PA555 | |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W6eRUtlujbkC&pg=PA555 | ||
}}</ref> The foreskin has protective, immunological, sensory, and sexual functions. The '''ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision''' being imposed on unconsenting minors (babies and children) has been a source of ongoing controversy.<ref>{{ | }}</ref> The foreskin has protective, immunological, sensory, and sexual functions. The '''ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision''' being imposed on unconsenting minors (babies and children) has been a source of ongoing controversy.<ref>{{BoyleGJ SvobodaJS PriceCP TurnerJN 2000}}</ref><ref name="RACPSumm">{{REFweb | ||
}}</ref><ref name="RACPSumm">{{REFweb | |||
|url=http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527 | |url=http://www.racp.edu.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=A453CFA1-2A57-5487-DF36DF59A1BAF527 | ||
|title=Policy Statement On Circumcision | |title=Policy Statement On Circumcision | ||