20,855
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Modern surgical foreskin restoration: Revise text and citation.
}}</ref> His article and the ones of the following years failed to give detailed information on the patient's motivation, and the authors were to a certain extent criticized for performing such a procedure at all. Penn from Johannesburg, after performing a proximal circular incision and pulling forward the [[penile skin]] to form a new [[prepuce]], covered the denuded shaft with a "free graft", not indicating from where he took this graft.<ref name="penn1963" />
An American medical doctor had a surgical reconstruction of his [[foreskin]] performed in the 1970s. He recently released a NSFW report published on his surgical foreskin restorationinvoluntary circumcision and its after effects.<ref>{{REFweb |url=https://drivedocs.google.com/filedocument/d/1Hmguuseuh0qyQjzc3WkbHvr9Qf3o99TN1WS4pmFCoHkq3UloORfSWi4VgnM11m_5-/viewedit |title=Was It Worth All My Extra Effort?Unwarranted Presumption
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|publisher=Google
|date=2022-12-10 |accessdate=20222025-1202-1220}}</ref> His report does not represent current practice.
In 1981, [[Paul C. Mohl]] presented the first detailed analysis of psychiatric aspects in a group of eight patients seeking prepuce restoration . He described several psychological disorders in these patients as narcissistic and exhibitionistic body image, depressions, major defects in early mothering, and ego pathology. Nowadays the understanding of the psychological motivations for uncircumcision is increasing, and the problem is dealt with more seriously.<ref name="watson2017" />