Erogenous sensation of the foreskin: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add link in SEEALSO section. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →No Foreskin (Johnny’s Song): Add external link. |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 266: | Line 266: | ||
|publisher=Appleton and Lange | |publisher=Appleton and Lange | ||
|year=1990 | |year=1990 | ||
}}</ref> | |||
Handler & Ginty (2021) described four types of low-threshold mechanoreceptors (LTMRs) found in glabrous skin — the Merkel cell complex, Meissner corpuscle, Pacinian corpuscle, and Ruffini ending.<ref name="handler2021">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Handler | |||
|first= | |||
|init=A | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Ginty | |||
|first2= | |||
|init2=DD | |||
|author2-link=David D. Ginty | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=The mechanosensory neurons of touch and their mechanisms of activation | |||
|journal=Nat Rev Neurosci | |||
|date=2021-09 | |||
|volume=22 | |||
|issue=9 | |||
|pages=521-37 | |||
|url=https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8485761/ | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=34312536 | |||
|pubmedCID=8485761 | |||
|DOI=10.1038/s41583-021-00489-x | |||
|accessdate=2026-01-15 | |||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| Line 492: | Line 517: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
In a 2007 study, which was published in ''BJU International'' | In a 2007 study, which was published in ''BJU International'', The researchers physically measured the sensitivity of all the parts of the [[penis]]. They used a very accurate pressure sensing probe while the test subject, who’s view was blocked with a screen, reported a sensation of touch. To demonstrate precision they took each measurement multiple times. To no surprise, their results corroborated with the neuro-anatomy that has been discussed previously.<ref name="FineTouchPressure" /> | ||
"Five locations on the [[foreskinned]] [[penis]] that are routinely removed at [[circumcision]] were more sensitive than the most sensitive location on the circumcised penis[...] The [[glans]] in the [[circumcised]] male is less sensitive to fine-touch pressure than the glans of the [[uncircumcised]] male[...]The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis is the [[circumcision scar]] on the ventral surface [...] When compared to the most sensitive area of the [[circumcised]] [[penis]], several locations on the [[uncircumcised]] penis that are missing from the [[circumcised]] [[penis]] were significantly more sensitive."<ref name="FineTouchPressure"/> | "Five locations on the [[foreskinned]] [[penis]] that are routinely removed at [[circumcision]] were more sensitive than the most sensitive location on the circumcised penis[...] The [[glans]] in the [[circumcised]] male is less sensitive to fine-touch pressure than the glans of the [[uncircumcised]] male[...]The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis is the [[circumcision scar]] on the ventral surface [...] When compared to the most sensitive area of the [[circumcised]] [[penis]], several locations on the [[uncircumcised]] penis that are missing from the [[circumcised]] [[penis]] were significantly more sensitive."<ref name="FineTouchPressure"/> | ||
| Line 552: | Line 577: | ||
===Foreskin sensation=== | ===Foreskin sensation=== | ||
<youtube>v=_t7uduP9egk&t=31s</youtube> | <youtube>v=_t7uduP9egk&t=31s</youtube> | ||
===No Foreskin (Johnny’s Song)=== | |||
<youtube>v=ZmNZQcgw7m8</youtube> | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| Line 604: | Line 631: | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFweb | * {{REFweb | ||
|url= | |url=https://intactaus.org/information/functions-of-the-foreskin/ | ||
|archived= | |archived= | ||
|title=Functions of the Foreskin | |title=Functions of the Foreskin | ||
| Line 713: | Line 740: | ||
|DOI=10.1111/andr.70118 | |DOI=10.1111/andr.70118 | ||
|accessdate=2025-09-29 | |accessdate=2025-09-29 | ||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/uncircumcised_talk/comments/1ibaw4y/which_is_more_pleasurable_if_you_are_intact/ | |||
|title=Which is more pleasurable if you are intact? | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|first= | |||
|init= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|publisher=Reddit | |||
|date=2025 | |||
|accessdate=2026-04-01 | |||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFweb | * {{REFweb | ||
| Line 721: | Line 759: | ||
|date=2025-11-24 | |date=2025-11-24 | ||
|accessdate=2025-11-25 | |accessdate=2025-11-25 | ||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/uncircumcised_talk/comments/1pwvms4/whats_something_about_foreskin_that_more_people/ | |||
|title=What's something about foreskin that more people should know? | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|publisher=REDDIT | |||
|date=2025-12-27 | |||
|accessdate=2025-12-29 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/intactinfo/comments/1qe1kkl/the_neurological_cost_of_circumcision_a_breakdown/ | |||
|title=The Neurological Cost of Circumcision, A Breakdown of What's Removed | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|author-link= | |||
|publisher=REDDIT | |||
|date=2026-01-15 | |||
|accessdate=2026-01-24 | |||
}} | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/comments/1rdq7r1/the_purpose_of_circumcision_was_chastity_but_it/ | |||
|title=The Purpose of Circumcision was Chastity, but it ironically makes men hypersexual | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|publisher=Reddit | |||
|date=2026-02-24 | |||
|accessdate=2026-02-26 | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||