Erogenous sensation of the foreskin: Difference between revisions

Foreskin sensation: Add external link.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 517: Line 517:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


In a 2007 study, which was published in ''BJU International''. They physically measured the sensitivity of all the parts of the [[penis]]. They used a very accurate pressure sensing probe while the test subject, who’s view was blocked with a screen, reported a sensation of touch. To demonstrate precision they took each  measurement multiple times. To no surprise, their results corroborated with the neuro-anatomy that has been discussed previously.
In a 2007 study, which was published in ''BJU International'', The researchers physically measured the sensitivity of all the parts of the [[penis]]. They used a very accurate pressure sensing probe while the test subject, who’s view was blocked with a screen, reported a sensation of touch. To demonstrate precision they took each  measurement multiple times. To no surprise, their results corroborated with the neuro-anatomy that has been discussed previously.<ref name="FineTouchPressure" />


"Five locations on the [[foreskinned]] [[penis]] that are routinely removed at [[circumcision]] were more sensitive than the most sensitive location on the circumcised penis[...] The [[glans]] in the [[circumcised]] male is less sensitive to fine-touch pressure than the glans of the [[uncircumcised]] male[...]The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis is the [[circumcision scar]] on the ventral surface [...]  When compared to the most sensitive area of the [[circumcised]] [[penis]], several locations on the [[uncircumcised]] penis that are missing from the [[circumcised]] [[penis]] were significantly more sensitive."<ref name="FineTouchPressure"/>
"Five locations on the [[foreskinned]] [[penis]] that are routinely removed at [[circumcision]] were more sensitive than the most sensitive location on the circumcised penis[...] The [[glans]] in the [[circumcised]] male is less sensitive to fine-touch pressure than the glans of the [[uncircumcised]] male[...]The most sensitive location on the circumcised penis is the [[circumcision scar]] on the ventral surface [...]  When compared to the most sensitive area of the [[circumcised]] [[penis]], several locations on the [[uncircumcised]] penis that are missing from the [[circumcised]] [[penis]] were significantly more sensitive."<ref name="FineTouchPressure"/>
Line 577: Line 577:
===Foreskin sensation===
===Foreskin sensation===
<youtube>v=_t7uduP9egk&t=31s</youtube>
<youtube>v=_t7uduP9egk&t=31s</youtube>
===No Foreskin (Johnny’s Song)===
<youtube>v=ZmNZQcgw7m8</youtube>


{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
Line 738: Line 740:
  |DOI=10.1111/andr.70118
  |DOI=10.1111/andr.70118
  |accessdate=2025-09-29
  |accessdate=2025-09-29
}}
* {{REFweb
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/uncircumcised_talk/comments/1ibaw4y/which_is_more_pleasurable_if_you_are_intact/
|title=Which is more pleasurable if you are intact?
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=Reddit
|date=2025
|accessdate=2026-04-01
}}
}}
* {{REFweb
* {{REFweb