IntactiWiki

United Kingdom: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats
21,635 edits
Add Video section.
 
(61 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 122: Line 122:
  |accessdate=2021-08-04
  |accessdate=2021-08-04
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
The introduction of [[circumcision]] as a medical practice was opposed by Dr. [[Herbert Snow]] who published a book entitled ''[https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/57083/pg57083-images.html The Barbarity of Circumcision]'' in 1890.


==Early Twentieth century==
==Early Twentieth century==
Line 218: Line 220:
  |accessdate=2021-09-05
  |accessdate=2021-09-05
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
Despite these efforts to promote [[circumcision]], [[foreskinned]] men have always been and remain the norm in the United Kingdom.


==Reduction of practice==
==Reduction of practice==
A national election was held in the United Kingdom at the end of World War II. The Labour Party gained a majority of the seats in Parliament and its leader, Clement Atlee, became prime minister. The party leaned to the left and supported social welfare. Aneurin Bevan was Minister of Health. [https://www.nhs.uk/ The National Health Service] (NHS) was created in 1948 to provide free medical treatment for all. Services were provided based on clinical need, not ability to pay. The NHS did not provide non-therapeutic circumcision, so the incidence of circumcision dropped to a very low level.<ref name="gollaher1994">{{GollaherDL 1994}}</ref>
A national election was held in the United Kingdom at the end of World War II. The Labour Party gained a majority of the seats in Parliament and its leader, Clement Atlee, became prime minister. The party leaned to the left and supported social welfare. Aneurin Bevan was Minister of Health. [https://www.nhs.uk/ The National Health Service] (NHS) was created in 1948 to provide free medical treatment for all. Services were provided based on clinical need, not ability to pay. The NHS did not provide non-therapeutic [[circumcision]], so the incidence of circumcision dropped to a very low level.<ref name="gollaher1994">{{GollaherDL 1994}}</ref>


Sir James Spence, a prominent senior British paediatrician, urged his younger colleague, [[Douglas Gairdner]], to produce a paper on infant circumcision. The now famous classic paper, ''The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision'', was published in the ''British Medical Journal'' on Christmas Eve, 1949. The paper reported 16 deaths per year from non-therapeutic infant circumcision and concluded in part: "'''The prepuce of the young infant should therefore be left in its natural state.'''"<ref name="gairdner1949">{{GairdnerDM 1949}}</ref>
Sir [[James Calvert Spence]], a prominent senior British paediatrician, urged his younger colleague, [[Douglas Gairdner]], to produce a paper on infant circumcision. The now famous classic paper, ''The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision'', was published in the ''British Medical Journal'' on Christmas Eve, 1949. The paper reported 16 deaths per year from non-therapeutic infant circumcision and concluded in part: "'''The prepuce of the young infant should therefore be left in its natural state.'''"<ref name="gairdner1949">{{GairdnerDM 1949}}</ref>


The NHS provides male circumcision when there was a clinical need.<ref>{{REFweb
The NHS provides male circumcision only when there was a clinical need.<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-men/
  |url=https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-men/
  |archived=
  |archived=
Line 239: Line 243:
  |format=
  |format=
  |quote=
  |quote=
}}</ref> The NHS performs circumcisions on boys for therapeutic need.<ref>{{REFweb
}}</ref> The NHS performs circumcisions on boys only for therapeutic need.<ref name="nhschild">{{REFweb
  |url=https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-boys/
  |url=https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-boys/
  |archived=
  |archived=
Line 256: Line 260:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


The ''British Medical Journal'', the house organ of the [https://www.bma.org.uk British Medical Association], in an unsigned editorial in 1979, slammed the practice of child circumcision, calling it unnecessary, and citing the danger of contracting staphylococcal infection in the newborn nursery.<ref>{{REFjournal
The ''British Medical Journal'', the house organ of the [https://www.bma.org.uk British Medical Association], in an unsigned editorial in 1979, slammed the practice of child circumcision, calling it unnecessary, and citing the danger of contracting staphylococcal [[infection]] in the newborn nursery.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Van Howe
  |last=Van Howe
  |first=Robert S.
  |first=Robert S.
Line 309: Line 313:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
===Phimosis diagnosis issues===
===Phimosis diagnosis issues===
Fewer boys were being circumcised so there were more [[intact]] boys. The general practitioners (GPs) in the UK seemed to be unable to distinguish between true [[phimosis]] and developmentally non-retractile healthy foreskin and were referring numerous boys for unnecessary circumcision.
Fewer boys were being [[circumcised]] so there were more [[intact]] boys. The general practitioners (GPs) in the UK seemed to be unable to distinguish between true [[phimosis]] and developmentally non-retractile healthy [[foreskin]] and were referring numerous boys for unnecessary [[circumcision]].


Rickwood et al. (1980) had provided guidance on diagnosis of phimosis. According to Rickwood et al. true phimosis occurs when the [[foreskin]] has been attacked by balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) (also known as lichen sclerosis). If BXO is not present then true phimosis does not exist.<ref name="rickwood1980">{{REFjournal
Rickwood et al. (1980) had provided guidance on diagnosis of [[phimosis]]. According to Rickwood et al. true [[phimosis]] occurs when the [[foreskin]] has been attacked by [[balanitis xerotica obliterans]] (BXO) (also known as lichen sclerosis). If BXO is not present then true phimosis does not exist.<ref name="rickwood1980">{{REFjournal
  |last=Rickwood
  |last=Rickwood
  |first=
  |first=
Line 349: Line 353:
}}</ref>  
}}</ref>  


Several papers critical of phimosis diagnosis practice in the UK were published in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Rickwood & Walker (1989) reported that in the Mersey region (northwest England) "many boys are circumcised for development non-retractability of the prepuce rather than for true phimosis and that in consequence some two-thirds of the operations are unnecessary."<ref name="rickwood1989">{{REFjournal
Several papers critical of phimosis diagnosis practice in the UK were published in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Rickwood & Walker (1989) reported that in the Mersey region (northwest England) "many boys are [[circumcised]] for [[Physiological phimosis| development non-retractability]] of the prepuce rather than for true [[pathological phimosis]] and that in consequence some two-thirds of the operations are unnecessary."<ref name="rickwood1989">{{REFjournal
  |last=Rickwood
  |last=Rickwood
  |first=
  |first=
Line 377: Line 381:
  |DOI=
  |DOI=
  |accessdate=2021-09-05
  |accessdate=2021-09-05
}}</ref> Griffiths & Frank (1992) also expressed concern regarding the apparent inability of general practitioners to distinguish between a true phimosis and a developmentally non-retractile foreskin. They pointed out, "Not surprisingly, the diagnostic inaccuracy was greatest when the referring doctor did not examine the patient."<ref name="griffiths1992">{{REFjournal
}}</ref> Griffiths & Frank (1992) also expressed concern regarding the apparent inability of general practitioners to distinguish between a true phimosis and a developmentally non-retractile [[foreskin]]. They pointed out, "Not surprisingly, the diagnostic inaccuracy was greatest when the referring doctor did not examine the patient."<ref name="griffiths1992">{{REFjournal
  |last=Griffiths
  |last=Griffiths
  |first=
  |first=
Line 433: Line 437:
  |DOI=10.1136/bmj.306.6869.1
  |DOI=10.1136/bmj.306.6869.1
  |accessdate=2021-09-05
  |accessdate=2021-09-05
}}</ref> Williams et al. (1993) complained that most of the 30,000 circumcisions that were being done in the UK were on boys under 15. They reported that of 69 boys referred by GPs, 29 had a healthy retractile foreskin, 30 had a healthy non-retractile foreskin, and only 9 had a phimosis requiring circumcision.<ref name="williams1993"> {{REFjournal
}}</ref> Williams et al. (1993) complained that most of the 30,000 circumcisions that were being done in the UK were on boys under 15. They reported that of 69 boys referred by GPs, 29 had a healthy retractile [[foreskin]], 30 had a healthy non-retractile foreskin, and only 9 had a phimosis requiring circumcision.<ref name="williams1993"> {{REFjournal
  |last=Williams
  |last=Williams
  |first=Nigel
  |first=Nigel
Line 467: Line 471:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


In defence of the much criticised British GPs, it should be stated that the data they were provided by [[Douglas Gairdner]] regarding development of foreskin retractility was very inaccurate,<ref>{{REFjournal
In defence of the much criticised British GPs, it should be stated that the data they were provided by [[Douglas Gairdner]] (1949) regarding development of foreskin retractability was very inaccurate,<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Denniston
  |last=Denniston
  |first=George C.
  |first=George C.
Line 496: Line 500:
Rickwood & Walker (1989) reported that 21,000 circumcision were done annually on boys under 15 years of age,<ref name="rickwood1989" /> so Cathcart et al. (2006) are finding a reduction of 53 percent,<ref name="cathcart2006" /> although still much higher than it should be. It should be noted that manual [[stretching]] of the [[foreskin]] with the aid of topical steroid ointment to relieve [[phimosis]] had not yet entered general use.
Rickwood & Walker (1989) reported that 21,000 circumcision were done annually on boys under 15 years of age,<ref name="rickwood1989" /> so Cathcart et al. (2006) are finding a reduction of 53 percent,<ref name="cathcart2006" /> although still much higher than it should be. It should be noted that manual [[stretching]] of the [[foreskin]] with the aid of topical steroid ointment to relieve [[phimosis]] had not yet entered general use.


The 2000 British ''National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles'' (Natsal 2000) found that 15.8 percent of British males aged 16 to 44 reported being circumcised. The incidence of circumcision was highest in the men aged 40-44 at 19.6 percent [born 1956-60] and lowest in the group aged 16-19 [born 1981-84] at 11.7 percent. Men of ethnic minorities (except black Caribbeans) were significantly more likely to circumcised than those described as "white". Jews were 98.7 percent circumcised and Sikhs, Hindus, and Buddhists were only 9.8 percent circumcised.<ref>{{REFjournal
The 2000 British ''National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles'' (Natsal 2000) found that 15.8 percent of British males aged 16 to 44 reported being [[circumcised]]. The incidence of circumcision was highest in the men aged 40-44 at 19.6 percent [born 1956-60] and lowest in the group aged 16-19 [born 1981-84] at 11.7 percent. Men of ethnic minorities (except black Caribbeans) were significantly more likely to circumcised than those described as "white". Jews were 98.7 percent circumcised and Sikhs, Hindus, and Buddhists were only 9.8 percent circumcised.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Dave
  |last=Dave
  |first=
  |first=
Line 542: Line 546:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Quaba & MacKindlay (2004) reported a 33.7% decline in the incidence of circumcision in Scotland from 1990 to 2000. This occurred because medical doctors were better trained in the recognition of healthy non-retractile foreskin in boys.<ref name="quaba2004">{{REFjournal
Quaba & MacKindlay (2004) reported a 33.7% decline in the incidence of [[circumcision]] in Scotland from 1990 to 2000. This occurred because medical doctors were better trained in the recognition of [[Foreskin#Foreskin_in_infancy_and_childhood| healthy non-retractile foreskin in boys]].<ref name="quaba2004">{{REFjournal
  |last=Quaba
  |last=Quaba
  |first=
  |first=
Line 604: Line 608:
  |DOI=
  |DOI=
  |accessdate= 2021-11-16
  |accessdate= 2021-11-16
}}</ref>
The percentage of males [[circumcised]] in the United Kingdom (prevalence) is reported to be 20.7%.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://circstatistics.github.io/
|title=Global Circumcision Statistics and Estimates
|last=
|first=
|init=
|publisher=https://circstatistics.github.io
|date=2024-04-01
|accessdate=2024-04-01
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 668: Line 683:
}}</ref> One perhaps unexpected effect of the Children Act 1989 was to bring circumcision cases into family court when parents disagreed about circumcision of a son.
}}</ref> One perhaps unexpected effect of the Children Act 1989 was to bring circumcision cases into family court when parents disagreed about circumcision of a son.


The [https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/ Law Commission of England and Wales] had proposed to recommend that circumcision of male children be made lawful. The late [[Christopher P. Price]], solicitor, (1996 submitted a brief to the Law Commission in opposition to the proposal,<ref name="price1996">{{REFdocument
The [https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/ Law Commission of England and Wales] had proposed to recommend that circumcision of male children be made lawful. The late [[Christopher P. Price]], solicitor, (1996) submitted a brief to the Law Commission in opposition to the proposal,<ref>{{REFdocument
  |title=Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront
  |title=Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/price-uklc/
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/price-uklc/
Line 730: Line 745:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


The family law case of [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3]] (2015) was about two children in need of care. This required [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Munby Judge Munby] to consider both male and female circumcision. Judge Munby realised that male circumcision inflicted at least as much harm as lesser forms of female circumcision. This caused him to rule that male circumcision caused ''significant harm'', which now allows courts to issue care orders to prevent male circumcision.
The family law case of [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3]] (2015) was about two children in need of care. This required [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Munby Judge Munby] to consider both male and female circumcision. Judge Munby realised that male circumcision inflicted at least as much harm as lesser forms of female circumcision. This caused him to rule that male circumcision caused ''significant harm'', which now allows courts to issue care orders to prevent male circumcision.<ref name="munby2015">{{REFdocument
|title=Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]
|url=https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/BandG_2_.pdf
|contribution=
|last=Munby
|first=James
|publisher=Royal Courts of Justice
|format=PDF
|date=2015-01-14
|accessdate=2024-07-11
}}</ref> Munby cited the Brief to the Law Commission of England and Wales by the late [[Christopher P. Price]] entitled ''Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront'',<ref name="price1996">{{REFweb
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/price-uklc/
|title=Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront
|last=Price
|first=Christopher
|author-link=
|publisher=Circumcision Reference Library
|website=
|date=1996
|accessdate=2020-09-12
|format=
|quote=
}}</ref>


The case of [[Re L and B (CHILDREN)| L and B (2016)]] was a case in which parents disagreed about the circumcision of two boys. The Muslim father wanted the boys circumcised, however the court ruled that no order should be issued so the boys could decide for themselves when they are of age. In this highly significant case, Mrs. Justice Roberts took the decision away from either parents and gave it to the boys, thereby recognising the boys' right to self-determination. Her conclusion is entirely consistent with the rights of the child under [[Human rights|human rights law]]. Her order also is entirely in accord with [https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=20174 Resolution 1952] of the [https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal Council of Europe].<ref name="resolution1952">{{REFdocument
The case of [[Re L and B (CHILDREN)| L and B (2016)]] was a case in which parents disagreed about the circumcision of two boys. The Muslim father wanted the boys circumcised, however the court ruled that no order should be issued so the boys could decide for themselves when they are of age. In this highly significant case, Mrs. Justice Roberts took the decision away from either parents and gave it to the boys, thereby recognising the boys' right to self-determination. Her conclusion is entirely consistent with the rights of the child under [[Human rights|human rights law]]. Her order also is entirely in accord with [https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=20174 Resolution 1952] of the [https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal Council of Europe].<ref name="resolution1952">{{REFdocument
Line 742: Line 779:
  |date=2013-10-01
  |date=2013-10-01
  |accessdate=2021-01-03
  |accessdate=2021-01-03
}}</ref>
The National Secular Society (2023) has called for the end of genital cutting of children.<ref name="nss2023">{{REFweb
|url=https://www.secularism.org.uk/religious-surgery/
|title=End forced genital cutting
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|publisher=National Secular Society
|date=2023
|accessdate=2023-09-23
}}</ref>
A court (Miss Nageena Khalique KC) has rejected a father's request  to have a 16-month-old boy [[circumcised]]. The court said the boy can have it done later if he wishes.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/child-protection/392-children-protection-news/58547-high-court-rejects-application-by-father-for-young-boy-subject-to-care-order-to-be-circumcised
|title=High Court rejects application by father for young boy subject to care order to be circumcised
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=LocalGovernmentLawyer
|date=2024-09-18
|accessdate=2024-09-19
}}</ref>
The [https://www.cps.gov.uk/ Crown Prosecution Service] charged Dr [[Mohammad Siddiqui]] with twenty-five [[circumcision]]-related crimes, to which he has pleaded guilty. He will be sentenced on 14 January 2025 in [https://www.find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk/courts/southwark-crown-court Southwark Crown Court].<ref name="cps2024">{{REFweb
|title=A former surgeon found guilty of causing harm during multiple male circumcision operations
|url=https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/former-surgeon-found-guilty-causing-harm-during-multiple-male-circumcision-operations
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|archived=
|trans-title=
|language=
|publisher=Crown Prosecution Service
|website=
|date=2024-10-31
|accessdate=2024-11-01
|format=
|quote=He showed a complete disregard for the impact of his actions on his victims, families, and communities. We hope that this conviction offers some comfort in seeing Siddiqui being brought to justice.
}}</ref> Sidiqui was sentenced to a serve five years and seven months in prison for causing children "gratuitous pain and suffering".<ref>{{REFnews
|title=SICK SURGERY: Ex-doctor made boy’s penis ‘explode’ after performing back street circumcisions using rusty tools & ‘restraint’ board
|url=https://www.thesun.ie/news/14536792/doctor-boy-penis-circumcision/
|last=Christodoulou
|first=Holly
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=The Irish Sun
|website=
|date=2025-01-15
|accessdate=2025-01-15
|quote=During one particularly gruesome op on a dining room table in Bristol, a boy's penis "exploded" — causing him to almost die.
}}</ref>
The [[Crown Prosecution Service]] (2026) wants to classify [[circumcision]] as "child abuse".<ref name="guardian2026">{{REFnews
|title=Circumcision classed as possible child abuse in draft CPS document
|url=https://www.theguardian.com/law/crown-prosecution-service
|last=Weaver
|first=Matthew
|init=
|author-link=
|last2=Osuh
|init2=Chris
|author2-link=
|publisher=The Guardian
|website=https://archive.is/Ztx07
|date=2026-01-10
|accessdate=2026-01-13
|format=
|quote=Circumcision is to be classed as a potential form of child abuse under new guidance for prosecutors, amid concerns from judges and coroners about deaths and serious harms caused by the procedure.
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 878: Line 985:
}}</ref> but has not prohibited non-therapeutic circumcision of non-consenting minors.
}}</ref> but has not prohibited non-therapeutic circumcision of non-consenting minors.


Although the UK has been a member of the Council of Europe, a [[human rights]] organisation since 1949, a state-party to the [[ICCPR]] since 1976, and the CRC since 1991, the General Medical Council has not revised its policies and procedures to recognise the [[human rights]] of child patients to the physical security of their person.
Although the UK has been a member of the [[Council of Europe Debate Genital Cutting Of Boys| Council of Europe]], a [[human rights]] organisation since 1949, a state-party to the [[ICCPR]] since 1976, and the CRC since 1991, the General Medical Council has not revised its policies and procedures to recognise the [[human rights]] of child patients to the physical security of their person.
 
The GMC holds four disciplinary sessions a year. Over the last decade it has disciplined 39 doctors for ritual (non-therapeutic) [[circumcision]] issues. The Medical Protection Society warned circumcision carries "considerable risks and complications”.  Religious and cultural [[circumcision]] on boys is permitted, including by non-doctors, and largely occurs among Jewish, Muslim and some African Christian communities, where they are often considered a religious obligation.<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Exposed: the horror statistics behind ritual circumcision of baby boys in the UK
|url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/exposed-horrors-ritual-circumcision-baby-28990951
|last=Penmman
|first=Andrew
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=Mirror
|website=
|date=2023-01-19
|accessdate=2023-01-20
|format=
|quote=
}}</ref>
 
The GMC will be holding a disciplinary hearing in the case of Dr Balvinder Mehat of Nottingham who has [[circumcised]] a second boy without the necessary two-parent surrogate consent and the wound became infected.<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Doctor circumcised second boy without parent's consent
|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-68180929
|last=Lowbridge
|first=Caroline
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=BBC
|website=
|date=2024-05-18
|accessdate=2024-05-30
|format=
|quote="I note that similar conduct by Dr Mehat has previously been determined to amount to serious misconduct. If it were found to have been repeated, this would be an aggravating factor."
}}</ref>


==The guidance of the British Medical Association==
==The guidance of the British Medical Association==
The [[British Medical Association]] (BMA) is a medical trade association. It represents and protects the interests of its doctor-members. Unlike American medical trade associations, the BMA do not claim to be an authority on medical science. Its advice to members address ethical and legal issues to assist members in staying out of legal difficulties. The BMA have provided several statements regarding child circumcision to inform its members since 1996:
The [[British Medical Association]] (BMA) is a [[medical trade association]]. It represents and protects the interests of its doctor-members. Unlike American medical trade associations, the BMA do not claim to be an authority on medical science. Its advice to members address ethical and legal issues to assist members in staying out of legal difficulties. The BMA have provided several statements regarding child circumcision to inform its members since 1996:


* 1996 [http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/bma/ Circumcision of Male Infants: Guidance for Doctors]
* 1996 [http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/bma/ Circumcision of Male Infants: Guidance for Doctors]
Line 932: Line 1,069:
# problems with child safeguarding, and (8) problems with regulation and training. <br>
# problems with child safeguarding, and (8) problems with regulation and training. <br>
# an unjustified presumption of lawfulness of NPC of minors and<br>  
# an unjustified presumption of lawfulness of NPC of minors and<br>  
#) failure adequately to address recent case law.<ref name="lempert2022">{{REFjournal
# failure adequately to address recent case law.<ref name="lempert2022">{{REFjournal
  |last=Lempert
  |last=Lempert
  |first=Antony
  |first=Antony
Line 970: Line 1,107:


In addition, they noted an egregiously inadequate description of the male [[foreskin]] and its functions.<ref name="lempert2022"/>
In addition, they noted an egregiously inadequate description of the male [[foreskin]] and its functions.<ref name="lempert2022"/>
The 2019 BMA Guidance for members on non-therapeutic circumcision of minors was withdrawn in Feburary 2025. A new guidance for treatment of children and young people under 16 has been published. Updated information regarding non-therapeutic circumcision of young people is now contained in Chapter 15.<ref>{{REFdocument
|title=Ethics toolkit: Children and young people under 16
|url=https://www.bma.org.uk/media/swsfdkbw/children-and-young-people-under-16-toolkit.pdf
|contribution=
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|publisher=British Medical Association
|format=PDF
|date=2025-02
|accessdate=2025-02-27
}}</ref>


==Symposia==
==Symposia==
Line 980: Line 1,129:
* The [[Fourteenth International Symposium]] on Genital Autonomy and Children's Rights convened at the {{UNI|University of Keele|KU}}, Keele, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom on September 14-16, 2016.
* The [[Fourteenth International Symposium]] on Genital Autonomy and Children's Rights convened at the {{UNI|University of Keele|KU}}, Keele, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom on September 14-16, 2016.


==A source of information and aid==
==British intactivist organisations==
 
* [[15 Square]] is a registered charity that provides information and aid to parents and both [[intact]] and [[circumcised]] males. The name refers to the approximate area of the adult male [[foreskin]] in square inches. 15 Square is based in Stone, Staffordshire.
 
* [[National Secular Society]] advocates separation of church and state. It has taken the position that religion does not provide authority to violate a child's [[human rights]] by not medically indicated [[circumcision]].<ref name="nss2025-01-28">{{REFweb
|url=https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2025/01/judge-and-parents-call-for-boys-to-be-protected-from-circumcision
|title=Judge and parents call for boys to be protected from circumcision
|last=
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=National Secular Society
|date=2025-01-17
|accessdate=2025-01-28
}}</ref>


[[15 Square]] is a registered charity that provides information and aid to parents and both [[intact]] and circumcised males. The name refers to the approximate area of the male [[foreskin]] in square inches. 15 Square is based in Stone, Staffordshire.
==Circumcision deaths==
==Circumcision deaths==
Gairdner (1949) reported 16 deaths per year.<ref name="gairdner1949" /> Death from circumcision still occurs.
Gairdner (1949) reported 16 deaths per year.<ref name="gairdner1949" /> [[Death]] from circumcision still occurs.


* Amitai Moshe, seven-days-old, stopped breathing and died after having been circumcised by a ''[[mohel]]'' (2007), who was a member of the [http://www.initiationsociety.net/ Initiation Society], at [https://www.goldersgreenshul.org.uk/ Golders Green Synagogue] in North London. It was thought that the infant had cardiac arrest, perhaps brought on by the [[Pain| painful circumcision]].<ref name="beckford2007">{{REFnews
* Amitai Moshe, seven-days-old, stopped breathing and died after having been [[circumcised]] by a ''[[mohel]]'' (2007), who was a member of the [http://www.initiationsociety.net/ Initiation Society], at [https://www.goldersgreenshul.org.uk/ Golders Green Synagogue] in North London. It was thought that the infant had cardiac arrest, perhaps brought on by the [[Pain| painful circumcision]].<ref name="beckford2007">{{REFnews
  |title=Police investigate baby's death after circumcision
  |title=Police investigate baby's death after circumcision
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/news/dailytelegraph2007-02-16/
  |url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2007/2007-02-16_dailytelegraph.php
  |last=Beckford
  |last=Beckford
  |first=Martin
  |first=Martin
Line 1,012: Line 1,174:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


* Goodluck Caubergs, four-weeks-old, bled to death in Oldham after Grace Adeleye circumcised him in April 2010. Adeleye was found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence at Manchester Crown Court.<ref>{{REFnews
* Goodluck Caubergs, four-weeks-old, bled to death in Oldham after Grace Adeleye [[circumcised]] him in April 2010. Adeleye was found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence at Manchester Crown Court.<ref>{{REFnews
  |title=Grace Adeleye guilty of killing baby in botched circumcision
  |title=Grace Adeleye guilty of killing baby in botched circumcision
  |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-20733674
  |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-20733674
Line 1,028: Line 1,190:


* Boma Oruitemeka: Death by circumcision, severe hemorrhage. 1990, London, England, United Kingdom.
* Boma Oruitemeka: Death by circumcision, severe hemorrhage. 1990, London, England, United Kingdom.
==Foreskin information from the National Health Service==
The National Health Service at Alder Hey has created a website with information about the [[foreskin]] for patients, parents and healthcare professionals.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://4skin-health.alderhey.nhs.uk/
|title=Information for patients, parents and healthcare professionals
|last=Kenny
|first=
|init=S
|author-link=Simon Kenny
|publisher=NHS Alder Hey
|date=
|accessdate=2025-02-21
}}</ref>


==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==
The BMA (2019) reports that the NHS therapeutically circumcises about 10,000 boys under 18-years-of-age per year.<ref name="bma2019">{{REFdocument
 
The incidence of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys in the United Kingdom has been substantially reduced from its former peaks in the 1930s and early 1940s. Non-therapeutic circumcision of boys remains lawful provided that both parents grant consent. The practice seems to be concentrated among ethnic minorities. Ethical and [[human rights]] concerns about the surgery persist.
 
Non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] is not covered by the NHS, so parents must find a private medical or non-medical operator such as a [[mohel]] to perform the [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] and must pay the fee out of pocket as [[third-party payment]] is not available. Given the recent legal cautions uttered by the BMA,<ref name="bma2019" /> it may not be easy to find a medical practitioner willing to accept the risk.
 
The NHS announced in November 2022 that it would no longer perform the 23,000 circumcisions that it had been performing every year.<ref name="warren2022">{{REFweb
|url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11410577/Circumcisions-tummy-tucks-liposuction-operations-stop-funded-NHS.html
|title=Circumcisions, tummy tucks and liposuction are among 13 operations which will stop being funded by the NHS in a 'crackdown' on wasteful spending in a bid to save £2bn a year
|last=Warren
|first=Jessica
|publisher=Daily Mail
|date=2022-11-09
|accessdate=2023-04-07
}}</ref>
 
The BMA (2019) reported that the NHS therapeutically circumcises about 10,000 boys under 18-years-of-age per year.<ref name="bma2019">{{REFdocument
  |title=Non-therapeutic male circumcision (NTMC) of children – practical guidance for doctors
  |title=Non-therapeutic male circumcision (NTMC) of children – practical guidance for doctors
  |url=https://www.bma.org.uk/media/1847/bma-non-therapeutic-male-circumcision-of-children-guidance-2019.pdf
  |url=https://www.bma.org.uk/media/1847/bma-non-therapeutic-male-circumcision-of-children-guidance-2019.pdf
Line 1,040: Line 1,230:
  |date=2019
  |date=2019
  |accessdate=2021-09-10
  |accessdate=2021-09-10
}}</ref> Professor [[Simon Kenny]], (2021) the leading doctor at [https://www.alderhey.nhs.uk/ Alder Hey Children's Hospital], has published a new guidance regarding child circumcision.<ref name="kenny2021">{{REFweb
|url=https://4skin-health.alderhey.nhs.uk/
|title=Information for patients, parents and healthcare professionals
|last=Kenny
|first=
|init=S
|author-link=Simon Kenny
|publisher=NHS Alder Hey
|date=
|accessdate=2025-02-21
}}</ref> The Daily Mail (2022) alleged that 1/2 of the 10,000 NHS [[circumcision|circumcisions]] of boys are unnecessary.<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Is the NHS carrying out thousands of unnecessary circumcisions on teenage boys? New report shows irreversible surgery is carried out 10,000 times per year
|url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10554847/Is-NHS-carrying-thousands-unnecessary-circumcisions-teenage-boys.html
|last=Ennals
|first=Ethan
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=The Daily Mail
|website=
|date=2022-03-01
|accessdate=2023-05-23
|format=
|quote=The analysis also found up to half of the boys who underwent medical circumcision at some trusts were under five, an age at which doctors agree the procedure is almost always unnecessary.
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


The incidence of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in the United Kingdom has been substantially reduced from its former peaks in the 1930s and early 1940s. Non-therapeutic circumcision of boys remains lawful provided that both parents grant consent. The practice seems to be concentrated among ethnic minorities. Ethical and [[human rights]] concerns about the surgery persist.
== Videos ==
=== Maajid Nawaz: Male circumcision consent ===
A discussion of consent for non-therapeutic male circumcision by Maajid Nawaz from Sky News


Non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] usually is not covered by the NHS, so parents must find a private medical or non-medical operator such as a [[mohel]] to perform the [[foreskin]] [[amputation]] and must pay the fee out of pocket as [[third-party payment]] is not available. Given the recent legal cautions uttered by the BMA,<ref name="bma2019" /> it may not be easy to find a medical practitioner willing to accept the risk.
==Video==
A discussion of consent for non-therapeutic male circumcision by Maaajid Nawaz from Sky News.
<br>
<youtube>v=1mrAZnijYcc</youtube>
<youtube>v=1mrAZnijYcc</youtube>
</br>
 
=== Great Britain - History of Foreskin and Circumcision ===
 
<youtube>v=OuDiIHRqEVA</youtube>
 
=== Why my penis is in constant pain - BBC stories ===
 
<youtube>v=rXDoezKLZjc</youtube>
===British Circumcision Debate - Should Human Rights Outweigh Religious Rights===
<youtube>v=I4-r0hxChi0</youtube>
 
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[15 Square]]
* [[Genital Autonomy]]
* [[Genital Autonomy]]
* [[Initiation Society]]
* [[Men Do Complain]]
* [[Men Do Complain]]
* [[Secular Medical Forum]]
{{LINKS}}
* {{URLwikipedia|United_Kingdom|United Kingdom}}
* {{REFnews
|title=And, cut! What it was like being circumcised in my 60s
|url=https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/may/06/and-cut-what-it-was-like-being-circumcised-in-my-60s
|last=Jeffries
|first=Stuart
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=The Guardian
|website=
|date=2023-05-06
|accessdate=2026-01-18
|quote=
}}
* {{REFweb
|url=https://intactamerica.org/cultures-that-reject-circumcision/
|title=Cultures That Reject Circumcision—And Why They’re Right
|last=Alissa
|first=Kristel
|init=
|author-link=Kristel Alissa
|publisher=Intact America
|date=2025-02-23
|accessdate=2025-05-08
}}
* {{REFweb
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/uncircumcised_talk/comments/1qxqitc/queen_victorias_grandson_started_the_fad_of/
|title=Queen Victoria’s grandson started the fad of destroying British royal foreskins.
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=REDDIT
|date=2026-02-06
|accessdate=2026-02-07
}}
{{REF}}


{{REF}}
 
 
[[Category:Male circumcision]]
[[Category:Country]]
[[Category:English-speaking nation]]
[[Category:History]]
[[Category:Statistics]]


[[Category:UK]]
[[Category:UK]]
[[Category:Europe]]
[[Category:Europe]]
[[Category:Male circumcision]]
 
[[Category:History]]


[[de:Vereinigtes Königreich]]
[[de:Vereinigtes Königreich]]
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/United_Kingdom"