Sexual injury of circumcision: Difference between revisions

Line 806:

|DOI=

|accessdate=2020-01-04

}}</ref> so the lack of the foreskin in the circumcised partner renders the female experience less satisfactory.

}}</ref> so the lack of the foreskin in the [[circumcised]] partner renders the female experience less satisfactory.

In a first of its kind, O'Hara & O'Hara (1999) carried out a retrospective survey of 138 women with experience of both [[intact]] and [[circumcised]] partners. The women overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus was different for the two groups of men. Of the women, 73% reported that [[circumcised]] men tend to thrust harder and deeper, using elongated strokes, while unaltered men by comparison tended to thrust more gently, to have shorter thrusts, and tended to be in contact with the mons pubis and [[clitoris]] more, according to 71% of the respondents. Women with intact partners had a higher rate of orgasms than women with [[circumcised]] partners. O'Hara & O'Hara concluded:

@@ Line 806: / Line 806: @@
   |DOI=
   |accessdate=2020-01-04
-}}</ref> so the lack of the foreskin in the circumcised partner renders the female experience less satisfactory.
+}}</ref> so the lack of the foreskin in the [[circumcised]] partner renders the female experience less satisfactory.
 In a first of its kind, O'Hara & O'Hara (1999) carried out a retrospective survey of 138 women with experience of both [[intact]] and [[circumcised]] partners. The women overwhelmingly concurred that the mechanics of coitus was different for the two groups of men. Of the women, 73% reported that [[circumcised]] men tend to thrust harder and deeper, using elongated strokes, while unaltered men by comparison tended to thrust more gently, to have shorter thrusts, and tended to be in contact with the mons pubis and [[clitoris]] more, according to 71% of the respondents. Women with intact partners had a higher rate of orgasms than women with [[circumcised]] partners. O'Hara & O'Hara concluded: