Plain facts for circumcised fathers of intact, foreskinned boys

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

Plain facts for circumcised fathers of intact, foreskinned boys is for circumcised men who avoided adamant father syndrome and courageously broke the cycle of trauma and abuse to protect the genital integrity of a son. Such men grew up missing a normal body part, so they know little or nothing of the normal foreskin of their newborn intact, foreskinned son. It is to these men that this page is addressed.

Almost everything you thought you knew about the human foreskin and circumcision is probably wrong

There is a massive circumcision industry that makes huge amounts of money[1] by performing a harmful medically not indicated circumcision amputation to excise the healthy foreskin from a substantial percentage of the male infants born in the United States.

Medical doctors have promoted this harmful operation and built the circumcision industry by lying to the American public for one and one-half centuries.[2] Doctors have ignored the protective functions of the foreskin against infection that evolved over about a million years of evolution, while ignoring the danger of infection from an open circumcision wound.[3]

Over decades, this has been caused much of the American public to become "brainwashed" and to believe the propaganda.[4] Fortunately, this is now changing,[5] so more boys are enjoying a normal, foreskinned penis.

Your son's foreskin

Evolution

Charles Darwin taught us that evolution works because the fittest are more likely to survive, and this drives out the less fit. The presence of the foreskin makes us more likely to survive, so the foreskin has evolved over millions of years of evolution. The foreskin provides protection to boys against trauma and protection against infection. The trauma and infection protection work as long as the foreskin is in its proper place where it covers and protects its penis, so evolution has provided two devices to keep a boy's foreskin in its proper place.

  • The inner surface of the foreskin is fused with the underlying glans penis by a common synechia, so it cannot be retracted.
  • The tip of the foreskin is too narrow to retract over the wider glans penis, so retraction is prevented.

First foreskin retraction

As your foreskinned son matures over a period of years, the synechia will dissolve and the tip of the foreskin will widen to permit retraction in adult life. The average age of first foreskin retraction has been found to be 10.4 years,[6] but the age varies widely among boys from about 5 years of age to about 18 years of age. His foreskin may not retract until after puberty.

His foreskin must be left alone. It is NOT supposed to be retracted during infancy and early childhood. Retraction of the foreskin provides an opportunity for contaminants and pathogens to enter the preputial sac. Your son should be first person to retract his own foreskin,[7] which he will not do if it is painful or not mature enough to retract.

Forced foreskin retraction by parents or other caregivers must be avoided.[8]

Care needed by the foreskinned boy's penis

Humans and their predecessors did not live in modern air-conditioned houses with hot and cold running water. They actually lived in such places as tents in the desert, jungle huts, igloos, and even caves. The foreskin evolved to provide protection in all of these circumstances. There is little for caregivers to do. The foreskinned boy only needs to have the outside of his foreskin washed as one would wash a finger.

Smegma

Although smegma has a very bad reputation, it actually is nothing more than a mixture of exfoliated skin, moisture, and skin oil that may collect in your son's preputial sac. It is normal, natural, harmless, and beneficial because of the skin oil that moisturizes the glans penis. The smegma may collect into lumps (sometimes called "pearls") under his foreskin. They are harmless and may be left alone until they work themselves out at the tip of the foreskin.

The danger of visiting an American doctor

Female physicians do not have a penis at all and the male American physicians come from the general population, which is mostly circumcised, so most male American doctors have no experience of having a foreskin. They receive little training on this normal body part and seem only to learn that it is to excised in infancy. There are many cases reported of forced foreskin retraction by American doctors and nurses. One cannot overemphasize the need to protect the foreskin of an intact boy at the doctor's office.[9] [10]

Stretching the foreskin

A few foreskinned boys will need to stretch their foreskin in puberty to widen the tip and help it become retractable.

Should boys look like their dads?

Some claim that boys should resemble their fathers. They claim if the father is circumcised, then the boy should be circumcised also. If one believes that, then it would be better for fathers to undertake foreskin restoration, so that they can, in time, resemble their intact son.

Fathers who chose to undertake foreskin restoration will, as restoration progresses:

Video

Two "circumcised" dads of intact ("uncircumcised") sons chat

Conclusion

Due to your thoughtful protection of your son from harmful circumcision, your intact son may expect to have only one-third of the penis issues as compared with circumcised boys.[11] Your son will not experience the pain and trauma. which cause sexual and psychological issues that trouble many circumcised boys in later life. Your son's future sexual partner will likely have a better sex life because of his intactness.[12]

When other men become aware of your happy, healthy, foreskinned son, they are likely to be encouraged to similarly protect any future son from the certain harm and losses of circumcision.

See also

External links

References

  1. ↑ REFweb Garrett, Connor (23 December 2023). The Economics of Circumcision: A Full Breakdown of This Penis Business, Intact America. Retrieved 4 June 2025.
  2. ↑ REFweb Garrett, Connor (10 November 2023). Pros and Cons of Circumcision (Spoiler: You’ve Been Lied to), Intact America. Retrieved 4 June 2025.
  3. ↑ REFweb Alissa, Kristel (21 May 2025). The Greatest PR Trick in Medical History: How Circumcision Got Rebranded as “Clean”, Intact America. Retrieved 5 June 2025.
  4. ↑ REFweb Alissa, Kristel (21 May 2025). How Circumcision Gaslit an Entire Generation, Intact America. Retrieved 5 June 2025.
  5. ↑ REFweb Anonymous (2024). Opposition to circumcision overtime., Intact America. Retrieved 1 June 2025.
  6. ↑ REFjournal Thorvaldsen MA, Meyhoff H. Patologisk eller fysiologisk fimose? [Pathological or physiological phimosis?] (Danish). Ugeskr Læger. 2005; 167(17): 1858-62. PMID. Retrieved 17 May 2025.
  7. ↑ REFjournal Wright JE. Further to the "Further Fate of the Foreskin". Med J Aust. 7 February 1994; 160: 134-5. PMID. Retrieved 17 October 2019.
  8. ↑ REFweb Ashford, Jeannie (12 September 2024). The Daycare Risk for Intact, Uncircumcised Babies and Boys: Forcible Foreskin Retraction, Intact America. Retrieved 5 June 2025.
  9. ↑ REFweb Protecting Children From Forced Foreskin Retraction, Your Whole Baby. Retrieved 17 May 2025.
  10. ↑ REFweb Anonymous (September 2023). Help for Wrongful Foreskin Retraction, Doctors Opposing Circumcision. Retrieved 17 May 2025.
  11. ↑ REFjournal Fendereski K, Horns JJ, Driggs N, Lau G, Shaeffer AJ. Comparing Penile Problems in Circumcised vs. Uncircumcised Boys: Insights From a Large Commercial Claims Database With a Focus on Provider Type Performing Circumcision. J Pediatr Surg. November 2024; 59(11): [161614]. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 18 May 2025.
  12. ↑ REFjournal Bensley GA, Boyle GJ. Effects of male circumcision on female arousal and orgasm. N Z Med J. 12 September 2003; 116(1181): 595-6. PMID. Retrieved 18 May 2025.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Plain_facts_for_circumcised_fathers_of_intact,_foreskinned_boys&oldid=42440"