History of circumcision: Difference between revisions

Line 141:

|issue=66

|pages=520-523

}}</ref><ref name="Eskridge1918">{{Eskridge1918}}</ref><ref name="McDonald1958">{{~~REFjournal~~

}}</ref><ref name="Eskridge1918">{{Eskridge1918}}</ref><ref name="McDonald1958">{{McDonald1958}}</ref><ref name="Rathmann1959">{{Rathmann1959}}</ref>

~~|last=McDonald~~

~~|init=CF~~

~~|title=Circumcision of the female~~

~~|journal=General Practitioner~~

~~|date=1958-09~~

~~|volume=18~~

~~|issue=3~~

~~|pages=98-99~~

}}</ref><ref name="Rathmann1959">{{Rathmann1959}}</ref>

[[FGC]] was even covered by Blue Cross Blue Shield until 1977. Nowadays, many forms of [[FGC]] are now considered forms of female genital mutilation ([[FGM]]), which are banned in all western countries.

Line 413:

Line 404:

}}</ref>

* 1958 [[C. F. McDonald]] says "the same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958"/>

* 1958 [[Christine F. McDonald]] says "the same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958"/>

* 1959 [[W. G. Rathmann]] finds that among the many benefits of female circumcision is that it will '''make the clitoris easier for the husband to find'''.<ref name="Rathmann1959"/>

@@ Line 141: / Line 141: @@
   |issue=66
   |pages=520-523
-}}</ref><ref name="Eskridge1918">{{Eskridge1918}}</ref><ref name="McDonald1958">{{REFjournal
+}}</ref><ref name="Eskridge1918">{{Eskridge1918}}</ref><ref name="McDonald1958">{{McDonald1958}}</ref><ref name="Rathmann1959">{{Rathmann1959}}</ref>
- |last=McDonald
- |init=CF
- |title=Circumcision of the female
- |journal=General Practitioner
- |date=1958-09
- |volume=18
- |issue=3
- |pages=98-99
-}}</ref><ref name="Rathmann1959">{{Rathmann1959}}</ref>
 [[FGC]] was even covered by Blue Cross Blue Shield until 1977. Nowadays, many forms of [[FGC]] are now considered forms of female genital mutilation ([[FGM]]), which are banned in all western countries.
@@ Line 413: / Line 404: @@
 }}</ref>
-* 1958 [[C. F. McDonald]] says "the same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958"/>
+* 1958 [[Christine F. McDonald]] says "the same reasons that apply for the circumcision of males are generally valid when considered for the female."<ref name="McDonald1958"/>
 * 1959 [[W. G. Rathmann]] finds that among the many benefits of female circumcision is that it will '''make the clitoris easier for the husband to find'''.<ref name="Rathmann1959"/>