Foreskin restoration: Difference between revisions
m wikify penile skin |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m →Physical aspects: Revise text. |
||
| Line 388: | Line 388: | ||
== Physical aspects == | == Physical aspects == | ||
The natural foreskin has three principal components, in addition to blood vessels, nerves and connective tissue: [[skin]], which is exposed exteriorely; [[ | The natural foreskin has three principal components, in addition to blood vessels, nerves and connective tissue: [[skin]], which is exposed exteriorely; [[mucosa]], which is the inside surface in contact with the [[glans penis]] when the [[penis]] is flaccid; and a layer of [[Dartos| muscle]] fibers under the foreskin. The [[ridged band]] is just inside the tip of the [[foreskin]]. | ||
Generally, the skin grows more readily in response to stretching than does the mucous membrane. The ring of muscle which normally holds the foreskin closed is completely removed in the majority of circumcisions and cannot be regrown, so the covering resulting from stretching techniques is usually looser than that of a natural foreskin. According to some observers it is difficult to distinguish a restored foreskin from a natural foreskin because restoration produces a "nearly normal-appearing prepuce."<ref name="Goodwin">{{REFjournal | Generally, the skin grows more readily in response to stretching than does the mucous membrane. The ring of muscle which normally holds the foreskin closed is completely removed in the majority of circumcisions and cannot be regrown, so the covering resulting from stretching techniques is usually looser than that of a natural foreskin. According to some observers it is difficult to distinguish a restored foreskin from a natural foreskin because restoration produces a "nearly normal-appearing prepuce."<ref name="Goodwin">{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 434: | Line 434: | ||
By growing more [[penile skin]], foreskin restorers recover the skin mobility that was eliminated by their circumcision. The ability to [[gliding action|glide the skin of the penis over the glans]] constitutes a mechanical component of the stimulation mechanism of the penis. | By growing more [[penile skin]], foreskin restorers recover the skin mobility that was eliminated by their circumcision. The ability to [[gliding action|glide the skin of the penis over the glans]] constitutes a mechanical component of the stimulation mechanism of the penis. | ||
In some men, foreskin restoration may alleviate certain problems they attribute to their | In some men, foreskin restoration may alleviate certain problems they attribute to their [[circumcision]]. Such problems, as reported to an anti-circumcision group by men circumcised in infancy or childhood, include prominent [[Circumcision scar|scarring]] (33%), insufficient [[penile skin]] for comfortable [[erection]] (27%), erectile curvature from uneven skin loss (16%), and pain and bleeding upon [[erection]]/manipulation (17%). The poll also asked about awareness of or involvement in foreskin restoration, and included an open comment section. Many respondents and their wives "reported that restoration resolved the unnatural dryness of the circumcised penis, which caused abrasion, pain or bleeding during intercourse, and that restoration offered unique pleasures, which enhanced sexual intimacy."<ref name="Hammond">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Hammond | |last=Hammond | ||
|init=T | |init=T | ||
| Line 452: | Line 452: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Some men who have undertaken foreskin restoration report a visibly smoother glans, which some of these men attribute to decreased levels of [[keratinization]] following restoration. | Some men who have undertaken foreskin restoration report a visibly smoother [[glans]], which some of these men attribute to decreased levels of [[keratinization]] following restoration. | ||
<!--Several studies have suggested that the glans is equally sensitive in circumcised and intact males,<ref name="masters">{{REFbook | <!--Several studies have suggested that the glans is equally sensitive in circumcised and intact males,<ref name="masters">{{REFbook | ||
| Line 563: | Line 563: | ||
|accessdate=2019-9-29 | |accessdate=2019-9-29 | ||
}}</ref>--> | }}</ref>--> | ||
Sorrells (2007) et al. and Yang et al. (2008) have reported empirical data that proves there is more sensation in intact males.<ref name="sorrels">{{Sorrells etal 2007}}</ref><ref name="yang">{{REFjournal | Sorrells (2007) et al. and Yang et al. (2008) have reported empirical data that proves there is more sensation in [[intact]] males.<ref name="sorrels">{{Sorrells etal 2007}}</ref><ref name="yang">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Yang | |last=Yang | ||
|init=DM | |init=DM | ||