15,658
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Regeneration of the foreskin: Add citation and text.
|accessdate=2022-03-24
}}</ref>
==Conclusion==Timmermans et al. (2021) report that "non-surgical foreskin restoration methods yield good results."<ref name="timmermans2021">{{REFjournal |last=Timmermans |first= |init=FW |author-link= |last2=Mokken |first2= |init2=SE |author2-link= |last3=Poor Toulabi |first3= |init3=SCZ |author3-link= |etal=yes |title=A review on the history of and treatment options for foreskin reconstruction after circumcision |trans-title= |language= |journal= Int J Impot Res |location= |date=2021-04-14 |season= |volume= |issue= |article= |page= |pages= |url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Floyd-Timmermans/publication/350881409_A_review_on_the_history_of_and_treatment_options_for_foreskin_reconstruction_after_circumcision/links/607d5ae9881fa114b41189e1/A-review-on-the-history-of-and-treatment-options-for-foreskin-reconstruction-after-circumcision.pdf |archived= |quote=Nonsurgical methods of reconstruction are rarely mentioned in literature. Nonetheless, nonsurgical methods, such as manual stretching and device-assisted tissue expansion, are commonplace among those who pursue foreskin reconstruction. Although the nonsurgical methods have yielded good results with minimal adverse effects, no proper medical research has been performed to quantify these outcomes. |pubmedID=33854205 |pubmedCID= |DOI=10.1038/s41443-021-00438-3 |format=PDF |accessdate=2022-06-09}}</ref>
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Circumcision]]