Psychological injury of male circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Autism spectrum disorder: Add text and citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m Italicize. |
||
| Line 818: | Line 818: | ||
[[Circumcised]] men historically have protected their feelings by denying that they have lost anything. Trivialization of the loss is a frequent defense mechanism. Another is the production of fantasies about the alleged horrors of [[smegma]], [[Pheromone| aroma]], and [[Acroposthion| appearance]]. | [[Circumcised]] men historically have protected their feelings by denying that they have lost anything. Trivialization of the loss is a frequent defense mechanism. Another is the production of fantasies about the alleged horrors of [[smegma]], [[Pheromone| aroma]], and [[Acroposthion| appearance]]. | ||
Research done since the 1960's forward to the present day has elucidated the nature, functions, and purpose of the [[foreskin]]. Circumcised men are learning what they have lost from the Internet, so they are less able to maintain the ego defense of denial of loss,<ref name="watson2017">{{REFjournal | Research done since the 1960's forward to the present day has elucidated the nature, functions, and purpose of the [[foreskin]]. Circumcised men are learning what they have lost from the Internet, so they are less able to maintain the ego defense of ''denial of loss'',<ref name="watson2017">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Watson | |last=Watson | ||
|first=Lindsay R. | |first=Lindsay R. | ||