History of circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text and citation. |
m using template DeWitte etal 2007 |
||
| Line 571: | Line 571: | ||
* 2007 [[Robert C. Bailey]] ends his study early with the conclusion '''touting circumcision as a 'vaccine' that prevents [[HIV]] infection'''.<br>(Note: This and other similar studies were widely reported throughout the American media.)<ref>{{RCT Bailey et al 2007}}</ref> | * 2007 [[Robert C. Bailey]] ends his study early with the conclusion '''touting circumcision as a 'vaccine' that prevents [[HIV]] infection'''.<br>(Note: This and other similar studies were widely reported throughout the American media.)<ref>{{RCT Bailey et al 2007}}</ref> | ||
* 2007 [[ | * 2007 [[Lot de Witte]] finds that '''[[Langerhans cells]] found in the foreskin are a natural barrier to [[HIV]] infection'''.<br>(Note: This and other similar studies were widely ignored throughout the American media.)<ref>{{DeWitte etal 2007}}</ref> | ||
}}</ref> | |||
* 2007 [[Morris L. Sorrells]] ''et al.'' tests the relative sensitivity of the penis and finds that the '''foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and the glans is the least'''.<ref>{{Sorrells etal 2007}}</ref> | * 2007 [[Morris L. Sorrells]] ''et al.'' tests the relative sensitivity of the penis and finds that the '''foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and the glans is the least'''.<ref>{{Sorrells etal 2007}}</ref> | ||
| Line 593: | Line 582: | ||
* [[United Kingdom]] | * [[United Kingdom]] | ||
* [[United States of America]] | * [[United States of America]] | ||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* {{REFweb | * {{REFweb | ||