Psychological injury of male circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Wikify. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Profound lack of understanding of psychological issues: Add text and citation. |
||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
== Profound lack of understanding of psychological issues == | == Profound lack of understanding of psychological issues == | ||
There was little awareness of emotional and/or psychological issues when child [[circumcision]] was being promoted in the late 19th century and early 20th century. For example, [[Douglas Gairdner]] made no mention at all of [[pain]], [[trauma]] behavior changes, or psychological issues in his landmark 1949 paper.<ref name="fate1949">{{GairdnerDM 1949}}</ref> | There was little awareness of emotional and/or psychological issues when child [[circumcision]] was being promoted in the late 19th century and early 20th century. For example, [[Douglas Gairdner]] (1949) made no mention at all of [[pain]], [[trauma]] behavior changes, or psychological issues in his landmark 1949 paper.<ref name="fate1949">{{GairdnerDM 1949}}</ref> | ||
Intact America (2023) reported that intact males were shamed.<ref>{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://intactamerica.org/foreskin-phobia-intact-penis-shamed/ | |||
|title=Foreskin Phobia: How The Intact Penis Has Been Shamed | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|first= | |||
|init= | |||
|publisher= | |||
|date=2023-12-21 | |||
|accessdate=2023-12-31 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
==Increasing awareness== | ==Increasing awareness== | ||