Psychological injury of male circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Revise citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
== Profound lack of understanding of psychological issues == | == Profound lack of understanding of psychological issues == | ||
There was little awareness of emotional and/or psychological issues when child [[circumcision]] was being promoted in the late 19th century and early 20th century. For example, [[Douglas Gairdner]] (1949) made no mention at all of [[pain]], [[trauma]] behavior changes, or psychological issues in his landmark 1949 paper.<ref name="fate1949">{{GairdnerDM 1949}}</ref> | There was little awareness of emotional and/or psychological issues when child [[circumcision]] was being promoted in the late 19th century and early 20th century. For example, [[Douglas Gairdner]] (1949) made no mention at all of [[pain]], [[trauma]], behavior changes, or psychological issues in his landmark 1949 paper.<ref name="fate1949">{{GairdnerDM 1949}}</ref> | ||
[[Intact America]] (2023) reported that [[intact]] males were shamed.<ref>{{REFweb | [[Intact America]] (2023) reported that [[intact]] males were shamed.<ref>{{REFweb | ||