Foreskin: Difference between revisions

Line 379: Line 379:
  |DOI=10.1016/j.surge.2016.11.002
  |DOI=10.1016/j.surge.2016.11.002
  |accessdate=2019-10-23
  |accessdate=2019-10-23
}}</ref> Frisch & Simonsen (2016) reported the incidence of meatal stenosis to be 3.7 times higher in [[circumcised]] boys.<ref name="frisch2016"/> Fendereski et al. (2024)carried out a massive study to compare intact boys to circumcised boys. The authors reported that [[intact]] ([[foreskinned]]) boys have only one-third as many penile problems as do [[circumcised]] boys.<ref name=fendereski2024">{{REFjournal
}}</ref> Frisch & Simonsen (2016) reported the incidence of meatal stenosis to be 3.7 times higher in [[circumcised]] boys.<ref name="frisch2016"/> Fendereski et al. (2024) carried out a massive study to compare intact boys to circumcised boys. The authors reported that [[intact]] ([[foreskinned]]) boys have only one-third as many penile problems as do [[circumcised]] boys.<ref name=fendereski2024">{{REFjournal
  |last=Fendereski
  |last=Fendereski
  |first=
  |first=